Don,
yes, after replaced the W16 the difference between the main signal and
the greatest spur is similar before. But we can see, that quantity of
spurs are much less.
Here is plots from Line-Out:
before replace the W16 : http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=33328
and after replaced the W16
Hi Alex,
What is the mod/problem found??
73,
Julius
n2wn
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
Hi for all K3-users,
Some weeks we searched for the reason of bad K3's sound and high level
IMD.
We tried to replace resistors on the line-out board. But it is
ineffectual.
Fortunately, Vlad
Julius Fazekas n2wn wrote:
What is the mod/problem found??
Yes Alex, can you please say more about what you found on the RF Board and
what the fix was?
Congratulations on the success!
73,
Barry N1EU
--
View this message in context:
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
Hi for all K3-users,
Some weeks we searched for the reason of bad K3's sound and high level
IMD.
We tried to replace resistors on the line-out board. But it is
ineffectual.
Fortunately, Vlad UN7GZ has found out the problem.
Vlad has analysed the
Priwet Bill,
In original K3 the W16 is monowire (on top of the RF-board),
but if we will analyze the scheme, we can see that W16 must be in the
screen.
The W16 are near non screen-shielded BP-Filters, and we can see second
RX-channel on my first web-link:
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
In original K3 the W16 is monowire (on top of the RF-board),
but if we will analyze the scheme, we can see that W16 must be in the
screen.
The W16 are near non screen-shielded BP-Filters, and we can see second
RX-channel on my first web-link:
Hi,
My spectrum on the line out isn't even as clean as the before picture. In
addition to the spur at 12kHz I have spurs at 3.9kHz and 7.8kHz. They, as
well as the 12kHz spur are down about 75dB relative to an above AGC
threshold single tone. They are independent of mode and passband settings. I
It is the green colored wire beneath the noise blanker board?
And you replaced it with a coaxial cable on the bottom side of the RF
board, is that right?
73,
Drew
AF2Z
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:25:56 +0200, Alex UR5LAM wrote:
Priwet Bill,
In original K3 the W16 is monowire (on top of the
Barry N1EU wrote:
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
In original K3 the W16 is monowire (on top of the RF-board),
but if we will analyze the scheme, we can see that W16 must be in the
screen.
The W16 are near non screen-shielded BP-Filters, and we can see second
RX-channel on my first web-link:
Yes Drew,
it is right.
And it is only beginning (W16).
73!
Alex UR5LAM
drewko wrote:
It is the green colored wire beneath the noise blanker board?
And you replaced it with a coaxial cable on the bottom side of the RF
board, is that right?
73,
Drew
AF2Z
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:25:56 +0200,
Hi Alex,
are the both ends of coax shield soldered to GND ?
thanks for info,
Lexa, OK1DST
K3/10 #727
Alexander Ponomarenko napsal(a):
Barry N1EU wrote:
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
In original K3 the W16 is monowire (on top of the RF-board),
but if we will analyze the scheme, we can
The schematic is in error. It was found that the coax was unnecessary.
The levels of signals reported are not audible at greater than 50-60 dB
down from normal signals and do not impact our sensitivity spec.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Barry N1EU wrote:
Alexander Ponomarenko-5 wrote:
In
Hi Lexa,
yes both, it's right:
http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=32786
73!
Alex UR5LAM
Alexandr Kobranov wrote:
Hi Alex,
are the both ends of coax shield soldered to GND ?
thanks for info,
Lexa, OK1DST
K3/10 #727
Alexander Ponomarenko napsal(a):
Barry N1EU wrote:
Alexander
Hi Eric,
may be error in schematic, may be in my head. :)
Please look on these new plots:
here is plot with s9-level signal from XG1 BEFORE replaced W16:
http://forum.cqham.ru/download.php?id=32057
and here is plot with s9-level signal from XG1 AFTER replaced W16:
Alex,
From what I see on your plots, the frequencies of the spurs have changed.
On the BEFORE plot, I see a main signal at -9dB and the 2 major spurs
are -78 dB at 10.4 kHz and another at -77 dB at 12.6 kHz. The
difference between the main signal and the greatest spur is 68 dB.
On the
Good point Don. Similarly, I noticed in the original post that, while the
noise floor in the fixed case was flatter, it was also 10dB higher than
the non-modified version, apparently masking the issue, not fixing it.
here is plot BEFORE modification (you can see terrible spur near 12kHz)
16 matches
Mail list logo