Yes I can confirm it! I got it abt 15 yaers ago and used and had a great
succes in QRP/SSB. I still have it, but now I use just CW and don't use the
clipper now.
Look for this type and you'll have very good results.

Best 72

Alex I0SKK




-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Stewart Baker
Inviato: venerdì 4 marzo 2005 10.10
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Oggetto: Re: [Elecraft] XTAL AND DSP simply is the best design


A British company called Datong brought out an RF clipper a few years back.
It
used active filters to tailor the mic audio then CMOS switches to produce a
DSB
signal at 50kHz, diode clip it, and demod it back to audio. They made 3
products
- an upmarket one with switches to select the clip level, one with pots on
the
front panel, and a board to fit in any suitable box or TX. It worked like a
champ. They are still available on the second user market.
I believe that a company in Germany now does an updated version.

RF speech clipping is the most effective simple audio processing as it does
not
produce in-filter distortion products, unlike clipping at audio base band.

73
Stewart G3RXQ

 On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:33:31 -0500, Larry Phipps wrote:
> I remember I had one of the first of those external rf clipper
>
> processors about 20 years ago... it was called Com-something. They used
> an "if" of about 50 kHz, with LC filters... it worked amazingly well and
> was sought after by DXers and contesters.
>
> Larry N8LP
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> You look at the TS-870, 746pro, and many other DSP rigs all make the same
>> stupid design flaw.
>>
>> Dual conversion DSP!  No multiple pole xtal filter.
>> No computer algorythm can emulate a multipe pole IF filter. These are
your
>> $2000-$3000 rigs
>>
>> The TS-850 had dual xtal IFs. However there was much junk from all  the
>> CPU's and yes up conversion, then downconversion and demod after the 2nd
IF
>> filter adds to the noise floor.
>>
>> How the R-7A did it was interesting. A 4 pole Fixed Xtal filter  followed
>> the upconverter.
>> It has a pass band of 12kcs. That's right a 12Khz wide IF. This gives
this
>> collectors radio
>> its used price tag of $2000. The 2nd IF used those 8 pole can  filters.
>>
>> I found the K-2 has crystal clear SSB with the 1.8khz filter  position.
The
>> R-7A the SSB gets muffled at 1.8khz. I use 1.8 khz only on the K2.  The
TR-7
>> used a 2 pole filter after up conversion.
>>
>> If you look at the schematic of the TS-850, you see the dual IFs are  in
>> the back of the receiver. So after upconversion the passband is 50kc
wide.
>> That
>> is a large window for synth junk to get in. HOWEVER IF YOU USE CW filters
>> in
>> both IFs, your CW reception will be as good as a K2
>>
>> The K2 wisely put much non xtal filtering right after the antenna  jack.
>> The band pass filters are wide enough for the Ham bands and very little
>> general
>> coverage. You lose general coverage ability of an R-7A. However do  you
>> really need a short wave rcvr in a ham rig?
>>
>> So yes one can compare the K2 with up to $3000 dollar rigs.
>> However on SSB TX the K2 comes up average. It is average because the SSB
>> adapter is a simple design. The all important audio chain is mostly in 2
>> chips.
>> However I always get good audio reports. A RF proc of the TS-850's design
>> would  make the K2 rock.
>>
>> There is a cheap way of doing this. There are a few speech procs  that go
>> between the mic and rig. They are true RF procs. Your audio is up
>> converted to
>> 500kc. The 500Kc RF is processed by using an AGC like amp. At the
RFstage
>> more compression can be used with out AUDIO DISTORTION. Any RF clipping
by
>> products are filtered out. The DSB signal is then down converted back to
>> audio
>> with the exact same phase it entered the device.
>>
>> So one is feeding in audio that was RF processed. One can use up to  12db
>> of RF processing. Audio processing gets distorted after 6db. One company
>> makes
>> this device for $60. It can be put in the mic or in the rig.
>> I am ordering one. I will give on air checks for those that  want too.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 02/03/05

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 02/03/05

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to