and broad (571). We made up.
73, Geoff GM4ESD
- Original Message -
From: David Toepfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] C W question/Cut numbers
I agree completely. Of course, a long dah is not necessary
--- Doug Faunt, N6TQS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, cut numbers are only used where there's no
ambiguity. There is certainly ambiguity possible in callsigns, [...]
But when giving a signal report or sending the zone as part of an
simple contest exchange, cut numbers are
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:29:57PM -0800, David Toepfer wrote:
--- Doug Faunt, N6TQS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, cut numbers are only used where there's no
ambiguity. There is certainly ambiguity possible in callsigns, [...]
But when giving a signal report or sending the
KXBill wrote:
The practice of cut numbers dates back to WW2, maybe further.After that,
it was a common practice on commercial circuits.
-
I've held a commercial CW license since the 1950's. While I wasn't working
as a commercial CW op all the
I read recently that a VLF station in Russia UT0 something received
permission to use the long T instead of the 0 for QRSS.
I remember when I was a novice in the 60's being told never to use the
long T in a callsign.
The ID question is interesting. I know that CW holds a special place,
but
5 matches
Mail list logo
