Let's not loose sight of the fact of the number of failed companies that
tried to
be everything to everyone. Elecraft has a nice nitch that they have
deservedly
carved out for themselves. Straying from that nitch by trying to compete
with the
rest of the crowd may not be in their best interests or
Gene A. Williamson wrote:
Looking at what I consider the three most important measurements of a
receiver's contest performance -- BDR, Ip3, and IMD at 5khz spacing
-- in the new ARRL review of the IC-7800, I read the K2 as superior
in ALL THREE areas.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, N6KR and
It's on the web. http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0408.pdf
Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456
snip
I haven't seen my QST yet. But I'll be looking for it
/snip
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post
I haven't heard one, but looking at the report, it appears they need to do
some work on the CW keying shape. Looks rather clicky to me!
snip
It's on the web. http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0408.pdf
/snip
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post
4 matches
Mail list logo
