Re: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7800 review

2004-07-20 Thread Julian, G4ILO
For ten thousand bucks it ought to have a button to control the 
reflectivity of the ionosphere. :-)

73,
--
Julian, G4ILO. (RSGB, ARRL, G-QRP, K2 #392)
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.qsl.net/g4ilo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]
 
The conclusions of the article are to quote:
 
The IC-7800 is a most impressive radio. It surpasses all other radios for  

the amateur market with its level of features, built in modes and user  
friendliness. The measured performance in most areas is excellent, although 
the 

[snip]



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:  
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7800 review

2004-07-20 Thread Robert McGwier
Yes but does it do windows and bathrooms?

Bob
N4HY


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julian, G4ILO
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 6:21 PM
To: Elecraft List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7800 review


For ten thousand bucks it ought to have a button to control the 
reflectivity of the ionosphere. :-)

73,
--
Julian, G4ILO. (RSGB, ARRL, G-QRP, K2 #392)
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.qsl.net/g4ilo


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Icom IC-7800 review

2004-07-20 Thread John, KI6WX

  Bob, indeed the IC-7800's close-in phase noise is so bad that
 measurements
 of IMD and BDR are noise limited.  As is detailed in the August QST
article
 about Product Testing, ARRL chooses to measure the composite result
including
 phase noise issues (see 3rd paragraph under both BDR and IMD sections on
page
 34 of August 2004 QST).  G3SJX simply lists noise limited but ARRL's
Expanded
 Test Reports shows the composite result.  Indeed the K2 beats the IC-7800
for
 BDR but is equal for IMD at 1 kHz spacings.  As has been discussed here
 previously, the K2's close-in performance also degrades quite a
 bit for signal spacings under 5 kHz.  I'm not sure whether this is
 due to filter blow-by or phase noise.  Here are the comparative
 measurements from ARRL's ETR's for the K2, IC-7800 and Orion at
 5 and 1 kHz spacings respectively:

 Rig IMD BDR (at 5/1 kHz spacings)
 K2  91/67   134/116
 IC-7800 89/67   115/96
 Orion   92/84   130/118

Bill;
I have extensive measurements of the K2 phase noise on all bands.  On 20
meters at a 20 kHz spacing, both the oscillator phase noise and the mixer
IP3 contribute to the overall dynamic range.  At less than 10 kHz, the phase
noise is dominate and limits the DR3.  I know that filter blow-by is not an
issue at 5 kHz with the CW filter.  Greater than 20 kHz, the K2 DR3 is
primarily limited by the mixer IP3 and the DR3 gets up to about 100 dB.
-John
 KI6WX


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com