From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given:
35 AC
33 BC
32 C
I see:
IRV will discard C, letting A win.
Condorcet will see 65 C winning over 35 A
The point is that the later no harm property means that there is no
incentive to truncate your ballot.
If A's
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:43:37 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given:
35 AC
33 BC
32 C
I see:
IRV will discard C, letting A win.
Condorcet will see 65 C winning over 35 A
The point is that the later no harm property means that
Let D1 be the candidate whose maximum pairwise opposition is minimum, in
other words the MMPO winner.
We could say that D1 is a good defensive candidate because she minimizes the
number of votes scored against her by any other candidate.
Similarly, let O1 be the candidate whose minimum
