As a quick recap, the Burr dilemma is where there is an incentive for voters
from
the same faction/party not to approve all members of that party.
E.g. if first choice preferences are
A1: 25%
A2: 30%
B: 45%
A1 and A2 agree to ask their supporter to approve each other.
The
At 09:46 AM 11/16/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A1 then wins as A1's supporters defected on the agreement even
though A2 was the least supported candidate and a minority of
the A party liked the candidate.
This incentive could result in B winning if both A2 and A1's
supporters did it, which
At 06:13 PM 11/16/2006, Stephane Rouillon wrote:
I definitively disagree with Abd, the Burr dilemna or any measure of the
number of starategy
a voter has to consider should be the main criteria to evaluate electoral
systems.
The issue was about an agreement between candidates. I was not
claiming
