Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-15 Thread Dave Ketchum
Makes me write of an interesting NY law and its history. In NY you can nominate by petition and, for fusion, the nominee on some of the petitions has to be outside the petitioners' party. BY NY LAW, if candidate is outside party, petition does not count unless party leadership approves.

Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-15 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:09 AM 9/15/2006, Scott Ritchie wrote: An interesting quirk of fusion voting is that it becomes possible for a candidate to obtain the nomination of every party. While this was rare for major elections, it did happen in quite a few cases with local elections. One wonders if more than a few

Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-04 Thread RLSuter
Fusion voting was a key part of the strategy of the New Party, which was formed in 1992 and was active for about six years. The party went into decline after the Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that states are not required to permit fusion voting. One of the founders of the New Party and its former

Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
We have an illegal war, an environment in crisis, apparent stolen elections, increasing probability of losing a major city through nuclear terrorism, the ever-increasing influence of special interests in politics, and we need to crush what? Fusion Voting? Give me a break. Fusion Voting, like

Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-03 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's a couple links that talk about this terrible "solution" to the spoiler problem: http://www.nmef.org/solution.htm http://www.blueoregon.com/2006/07/new_party_pushe.html Ok, yeah, no journalistic integrity, I'm pre-biasing you all against thi stuff, oh well.

[EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-02 Thread Brian Olson
Here's a couple links that talk about this terrible solution to the spoiler problem: http://www.nmef.org/solution.htm http://www.blueoregon.com/2006/07/new_party_pushe.html Ok, yeah, no journalistic integrity, I'm pre-biasing you all against this stuff, oh well. The short short version: