Hi all,
The reason why the naming of instant runoff voting is such appealing
marketing is because it paints a false picture. I think people often
think they are getting the equivalent of a hierarchical tournament when
they advocate IRV.
Take the Tennessee example here:
From: Rob Lanphier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It occurs to me that a pretty cool voting system could be devised
along
this path (and probably has been -- please let me know who I'm ripping
off here).
At 11:08 PM -0700 6/19/06, Rob Lanphier wrote:
It occurs to me that a pretty cool voting system could be devised along
this path (and probably has been -- please let me know who I'm ripping
off here). Seeding could be done by number of first place votes (i.e.
the plurality voting ranking). So,
