Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw

2007-01-23 Thread raphfrk
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], warren_d_smith31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope! I wrote that __only where a state refuses to publish the data needed to calculate the pairwise matrix__ the ballots from this state should be interpreted as FPP ballots. --true. And in the event the data IS

Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw

2007-01-22 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Warren, you wrote (22 Jan 2007): Interesting idea, but (a) Schulze ignores approval (?) and definitely ignores range voting. I suppose these could be incorporated into his framework by interpreting these kinds of ballots as rank ballots (with equalities in the case of approval) then