On Apr 22, 2007, at 7:37 , Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Some voters may trust trust the candidates, some not. Both OK. The
new method may be so good that it makes the candidates/
representatives less corrupt than before. But there is also the risk
that candidates will use their negotiating
At 03:28 PM 4/21/2007, Juho wrote:
Some voters may think that the candidates know the political
questions better and are better up to date than the voter himself/
herself. Some think the other way around. Both OK. The voter may be
confident in his/her opinions and finds deviations from them
At 11:09 AM 4/19/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it has the same problems as PR-STV where surpluses are not
transferred. A
voter wastes the excess of his vote if he votes for someone who is elected.
I'm just taking the opportunity to note the similarity between
multiwinner STV and Asset
RE: [EM] Tim Hull's PR method
Warren Smith wds at math.temple.edu
1. Voters vote for up to n candidates - n being either # of open seats or
# of candidates
2. Each voter has one vote equally and evenly divided among the candidates
they voted for.
3. After doing the first count,
