Re: [EM] the 'who' and the 'what'

2008-09-26 Thread Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Michael Allan wrote: Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote: That is interesting. Perhaps one could have, for example, a Condorcet party that pledges to run the Condorcet winner of an earlier internal election for president. Then various small parties could nominally join up with the Condorcet party,

Re: [EM] the 'who' and the 'what'

2008-09-26 Thread Raph Frank
On 9/26/08, Kristofer Munsterhjelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems this system would be more stable than I originally thought. Third parties could run as parts of the Condorcet party without running much of a risk, since they would otherwise get no votes at all. The defection danger