Good Morning, Michael
Thank you for that.
If I made my presentation in a way that could be misunderstood, the
error is mine. If you misunderstood, others will too, and that's a flaw
in the presentation.
I appreciate your gracious offer of a truce, but deeply regret
conducting myself in a
Chris Benham wrote:
I have an idea for a FBC complying method that I think is clearly
better than the version of Range Voting (aka Average Rating or
Cardinal Ratings) defined and promoted by CRV.
http://rangevoting.org/
I suggest that voters use multi-slot ratings ballots that
Dave Ketchum wrote:
When there is a cycle (3 or more in a near tie) there could be demos
of whatever resolution procedures please someone.
I was never concerned with a final decision. I doubt these are in
your ballpark:
a) Time. Votes are shiftable. If electorate wants to be decisive,
Can't the municipal level respond to the preocupations of these
geographically defined communities and the national/provincial/federal
level answer to other considerations?
From: Jonathan Lundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: 'Election Methods Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Functional Equivalences between Public (Parallel Phantom)
and Administrative Electoral Systems
* Functionally Qualifier (as phantom)
Equivalent to
--- -- -
1 Party primaryHas no connection to any
Stéphane Rouillon Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:27 PM
Can't the municipal level respond to the preocupations of these
geographically defined communities and the
national/provincial/federal
level answer to other considerations?
This reflects a delightfully detached view of politics
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:19:52 -0400 Michael Allan wrote:
Dave Ketchum wrote:
When there is a cycle (3 or more in a near tie) there could be demos
of whatever resolution procedures please someone.
I was never concerned with a final decision. I doubt these are in
your ballpark:
I see the
Chris Benham wrote:
Yes. I suggest that those not rated should be interpreted as
disapproved and bottom-most rated. Those candidates rated zero
should be considered to be half-approved. Candidate X's approval
opposition to Y should be X's approval score (including of course the
half-approvals)
