of the current members at a lower 'price'.
Also, if the legislature doesn't also decide the government, then there might
not even be a fixed majority coalition.
PS
Anyone know a better free mail system that doesn't cause lots of ??? when
I post to this group?
Raphfrk
Interesting
.
This does break the optimal utility effect though.
Raphfrk
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
for write ins should keep the burden low
enough.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
www.wikocracy.com
?
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
be an issue.? One option would be to share tax income out
proportionally.
Each member of the legislature could decide what ministries their share is
allocated to.
Tax cuts/raises are an even bigger issue.?
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
candidate eliminates a voter and then the
eliminated voter eliminates the next one ?
In a polarised 2-party setting, this would cause alternating eliminations ...
which is probably a good thing.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
is N-R-S
In both cases, N, R and S are eliminated before Banotti.
Thus it might look like contingent vote but is actually PR-STV (single seat).
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
www.wikocracy.com
From: Kathy Dopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments below
-- Forwarded message --
From:? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, May 10, 2008 at 7:22 AM
Pathological scenarios
can be constructed for all voting systems, including whatever ones Kathy
may prefer to IRV.
Diagrams from
Jobst wrote:
Dear Raphfrk,?
it did not think through all you wrote yet, but one point troubles me:?
Also, it is majority compliant. If a majority support a candidate first
choice (i.e. first choice and nominate him), then he cannot lose.?
If that is true, your method cannot
in the nominate column
In the rank column, rank the candidates in order of your preference giving a
rank of 1 to your least favourite, 2 to your next least favourite and so on
You do not have to rank all the candidates and any you do not rank will be
considered preferred to any ranked candidate
Raphfrk
as he will be the first choice of all those voters.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
www.wikocracy.com
AOL's new homepage has launched. Take a tour at http
In the single winner case, PR-STV is showing all the issues highlighted by Yee.
However, it also shows up in the multi-winner case for certain inputs.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
www.wikocracy.com
In the above example, it is a perfect tie, but there might be a way to get it
to converge.
Also, it doesn't use ratings at all and only considers the rankings. The last
strategy would use ratings though.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
achieves the above more directly.? Even without
using the market
itself to select the winner, trading on the market should make every voter
indifferent to the
outcome.
Raphfrk
Interesting site
what if anyone could modify the laws
www.wikocracy.com
Seems there's something seriously broken with copy/paste on AIM mail.
From: Jobst Heitzig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Democratic decision systems avoid the necessity of fighting to prove
strength by assuming strength from numbers and making the necessary
accomodations.
In my opinion
14 matches
Mail list logo
