Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right?

2000-12-04 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Mike, you wrote (3 Dec 2000): Much simpler, much more justified. Here's how I write Condorcet's Criterion: If there's a sincere CW, and if everyone votes sincerely, then that sincere CW should win. A voter votes sincerely if he doesn't vote a preference that isn't a sincere

Re: [EM] Schulze's method fails Condorcet's Criterion, right?

2000-12-04 Thread MIKE OSSIPOFF
Markus asked: 1. You forgot to define the term "sincere CW." I didn't state a definition for "sincere CW", because we earlier discussed that, and my definition for "sincere CW" is the same as yours: A sincere CW is a candidate who, when compared separately to each one of the other candidates,