Dear Blake,
Mike wrote (3 Oct 2000):
I advocated Smith//PC because of Smith and the criteria that go
with Smith, in addition to SFC WDSC. GSFC Full SDSC compliance
weren't among my reasons for advocating Smith//PC, because
Smith//PC doesn't offer that. Smith//PC, as I said, and as I
Markkus requested of Blake:
Could you please demonstrate that Smith//MinMax(wv) fails and
Tideman(wv) meets SDSC as Mike suggests?
I haven't demonstrated that Smith//PC fails SDSC or GSFC. As I said,
that will be demonstrated when I (or Blake) posts the failure
examples for Smith//PC. I hope
