I'd said:
If EM ever needs to vote on something, a good system might be
to count the ballots by BeatpathWinner and by Tideman(wv), and
choose the winner that pairwise-beats the other.
Markus said:
Could you please demonstrate that your proposal meets
monotonicity?
I don't have a
Markus said:
When we count the ballots by Tideman and Schulze and
then choose that candidate of these 2 winners whose worst pairwise
defeat is smaller then this would violate independence from clones.
When we count the ballots by Tideman and Schulze and then choose
that candidate of these 2
Dear Mike,
you wrote (25 Oct 2000):
Ok, Markus, but what would you say to a suggestion that we
count the ballots by Tideman(wv) and by BeatpathWinner, and then
hold a 2nd balloting so people can vote which of those 2 winners
they prefer? That sounds democratic to me.
...
If EM ever
Rob Lanphier wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Bart Ingles wrote:
My thought while reading it was, "Gee, I'm glad to see someone found a
legitimate use for Borda!"
I think that was the most interesting part. I wonder how the various
Condorcet methods would hold up in handwriting
Dear Markus and Mike,
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Markus Schulze wrote:
Mike wrote (25 Oct 2000):
An example: Steve said that, when Tideman(wv) and BeatpathWinner
give different results, the Tideman(wv) winner pairbeats the
BeatpathWinner winner in the vast majority of cases. So if the
Dear Mike,
you wrote (25 Oct 2000):
An example: Steve said that, when Tideman(wv) and BeatpathWinner
give different results, the Tideman(wv) winner pairbeats the
BeatpathWinner winner in the vast majority of cases. So if the
people could choose between those winners, they'd choose the
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Bart Ingles wrote:
My thought while reading it was, "Gee, I'm glad to see someone found a
legitimate use for Borda!"
Rob L. replied:
I think that was the most interesting part. I wonder how the various
Condorcet methods would hold up in handwriting recognition, etc.
Rob Lanphier wrote:
This is a great article. I don't entirely agree on the conclusion (Donald
Saari's work on Borda again comes out pretty favorably), but the fact that
the reporter also talked to Brams makes it a much more balanced article
than the piece in the Economist a few months
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Bart Ingles wrote:
From the November '00 issue of Discover. Should be understandable even
to someone who has difficulty grasping the concept of approval voting:
http://www.discover.com/nov_00/gthere.html?article=featbestman.html
Rob L. wrote:
This is a great
From the November '00 issue of Discover. Should be understandable even
to someone who has difficulty grasping the concept of approval voting:
http://www.discover.com/nov_00/gthere.html?article=featbestman.html
10 matches
Mail list logo
