[EM] summary of order reversal software output (6/6/1999)

1999-06-07 Thread Steve Eppley
I've corrected the bug implied by Markus's comment to my previously posted summary. I've also tested some additional methods since then, including Paul Dumais' method and Nanson's method. --Steve -- Markus wrote: Steve wrote: -snip- Method "Schz" is Schulze's Method. Though it

Re: [EM] Summary of order reversal software output

1999-05-28 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Steve, you wrote (27 May 1999): Method "Schz" is Schulze's Method. Though it appears to perform worse than VA on most stats, it might perform better with more than 3 alternatives. This is surprising because (if there are less than four candidates) Schulze's Method is identical to VA.

[EM] Summary of order reversal software output

1999-05-27 Thread Steve Eppley
In another message (my reply to Markus about JITW) I mentioned that I'd post this summary. There's some more info about this in that JITW message. Below is a table of order reversal scenarios in 3-alternative elections, given various voting methods. (Hopefully I haven't written buggy