[EM] average over time proportionality election method

2006-03-04 Thread raphfrk
The method works as follows: For the first election, the candidate elected would be just the plurality winner. However, the winning candidate would get to keep votes equal to the excess over the 2nd highest candidate. All other candidates would get to keep all of their votes. In subsequent

Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method

2006-03-05 Thread raphfrk
Very interesting idea! Reminds me of Ebay :-) But: This leads to the long term average number of seats for the candidate matching the candidate's proportion of votes. Can you prove this? Seems not so obvious to me... It is based on the assumption that the cost in votes to get elected is

Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result

2006-03-14 Thread raphfrk
Jonathan Lundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff O'Neill (who I think is on this list) suggests a tree representation of an ranked election profile (Voting matters #21 http://www.mcdougall.org.uk/VM/ISSUE21/INDEX.HTM) as a means of speeding up the tabulation of the election. It seems to me that

Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet

2006-03-20 Thread RaphFrk
Dan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's my idea: STEP 1: Set the price of a vote for each position. This could be proportional to the budget of the ministry. Example: The Republic of Electoria spends 4% of its budget on justice, 3% on the treasury, and 93% on defense (the country is

Re: [EM] A much simpler proportional Condocet Method - BTR-STV

2006-05-21 Thread raphfrk
Now, first I'm going to introduce to you the idea of the proportional Condorcet winner. The are several of these in an election, and the majority Conorcet winner is always among them. A proportional Condorcet winner is the Condorcet winner of the minority of the electorate. For instance,

Re: [EM] Methods based on sequential voting

2006-05-27 Thread raphfrk
From: Simmons, Forest [EMAIL PROTECTED] In some elections not all of the ballots are cast at the same time, and furthermore, the partial results (from exit polls, say) may be available to voters later in the sequence. In any case, some voters may prefer to vote near the beginning of the

Re: [EM] An example of BTR-STV

2006-06-07 Thread raphfrk
Anthony O'Neal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (This is the election I pulled out of the Wikipedia article for CPO-STV. I just didn't feel like making up an election where the results from CPO-STV and STV differ right now. If you want to see how the results for the CPO-STV and STV results were

Re: [EM] Democratic Lottery Enhancement

2006-06-08 Thread raphfrk
Simmons, Forest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the purposes of this message, a lottery is a stack of papers of standard copier size (8.5 inch by 11 inch) such that each paper has the name of exactly one candidate typed on it. This stack of papers is a lottery in the sense that a sheet of

[EM] Changing government without having to change policy

2006-06-08 Thread raphfrk
In the standard peer assembly election method, the only way to kick the incumbent government out of office is to give the opposition parties control of the legislature. This means that there is resistance to kicking out corrupt/lazy incumbents as it could shift the balance to parties that would

Re: [EM] Democratic Lottery Enhancement

2006-06-08 Thread raphfrk
Jobst Heitzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is not independent of cloning ... in a big way :). What makes you think so? Assuming we add a clone y of x so that all voters have x and y neighboured in their ranking and so that the new initial proportions of papers naming either x or y is the same as the

Re: [EM] Democratic Lottery Enhancement

2006-06-09 Thread raphfrk
Jobst Heitzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Raphael again! If so, there is an odd number of winners in that case, which might prove problematic. For example: 2 abc 2 bca 3 cab Starting with a uniform distribution, we get: no. of papers for iterationabc

Re: [EM] voting reform effort in DENVER - PLEASE HELP

2006-06-11 Thread raphfrk
Jan Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think a victory for IRV in Denver would be a step SIDEways for voting reform in general. Yes, IRV is better than Plurality + delayed top-two runoff. Yes, a victory for IRV would get the issue of voting reform a little more into the public consciousness;

Re: [EM] PR via self-chosen districts? (was Re: voting reform effort in DENVER - PLEASE HELP)

2006-06-11 Thread raphfrk
Allen Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on 11 June 2006 15:15:22 +0100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Gilmour) wrote: Promoters of the many different voting systems need to stand back from all the competing technicalities for one moment and ask the question: What is the

Re: [EM] Suggested name for Range Voting: Free Voting

2006-06-16 Thread raphfrk
Anthony O'Neal [EMAIL PROTECTED] write: And about the proportional range system I talked about earlier, the workings of the system is obvious. Under PAV rules, you assume that candidates give 1 point to an outcome for having one approved of candidate, 1/3 for the second approved of

Re: [EM] Suggested name for Range Voting: Free Voting

2006-06-16 Thread raphfrk
Anthony O'Neal thasupasacfitinman at gmail.com wrote: Tactical voting works against that. If people tactical vote, then they get no method to express their actual desired. I don't think you understand the method. It was a very short description, but PAV is not vulnerable to

Re: [EM] Challenging the instant runoff name (and instant playoff voting)

2006-06-20 Thread raphfrk
From: Rob Lanphier [EMAIL PROTECTED] It occurs to me that a pretty cool voting system could be devised along this path (and probably has been -- please let me know who I'm ripping off here).

Re: [EM] Ruminations on strategy issues in IRV and Condorcet (was possible improved IRV method)

2006-06-30 Thread raphfrk
From: Simmons, Forest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any time that IRV does not elect the sincere CW (when there is one) there is going to be a strong incentive for order reversal under IRV, except under the (non-existent) zero information case. [The only real life cases that exist in hot elections are

Re: [EM] candidate withdrawal IRV - what should the rules be?

2006-06-30 Thread raphfrk
From: Jan Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] A couple weeks ago Forest Simmons suggested the candidate withdrawal option as a way of improving most election methods. I just realized that the candidate withdrawal option would greatly mitigate the center squeeze problem with IRV. (Sometimes it takes a

Re: [EM] Mass Candidates

2006-07-03 Thread raphfrk
From: dave smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] I need help in determining what voting system would be best for the following criteria: ~500 candidates ~1000 voters 1 winner I was going to do a form of PV, but limit the number of ranks to 3. The problem with this is that what if there are more

Re: [EM] Mass Candidates

2006-07-07 Thread raphfrk
From: Anthony Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Stephane Rouillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any system that would leave a default value for unvalued/unranked/unapproved candidates would help. Personnaly, I would suggest: A) Let the voter precise the score, rank or state of all unexpressed

Re: [EM] Competitive Districting Rule

2006-07-07 Thread raphfrk
From: Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Agreed that redistricting should be based only on the decennial census - what was done in Texas needs forbidding. Btw, what is your opinion on having districts setup so that a minority group can get a reasonable number of seats ? Likewise what they were

Re: [EM] IRV in the news

2006-07-27 Thread raphfrk
From: Jan Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 7/24/06, Monkey Puzzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anybody say Straw Man? I don't understand what you're trying to say, M.P. No one (on this list) is claiming this North Carolina thing is real IRV. The NC thing is an abomination. However, it is a good

Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy

2006-09-01 Thread raphfrk
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax (Wed Aug 30 19:53:20 PDT 2006) Wrote: At 10:00 AM 8/30/2006, raphfrk at netscape.net wrote: I think another big issue is that something like this is actually annoying until you hit the scaling issues. In a forum with say 20 users, you don't actually need it. However

Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy

2006-09-01 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wikis can handle this easily, leaving a record of who edited the file for each edit, so we can confirm, if needed, that it was the member who added his or her record and designated the proxy, and it was the proxy who accepted. Someone would still have root access for

Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting

2006-09-03 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's a couple links that talk about this terrible "solution" to the spoiler problem: http://www.nmef.org/solution.htm http://www.blueoregon.com/2006/07/new_party_pushe.html Ok, yeah, no journalistic integrity, I'm pre-biasing you all against thi stuff, oh well.

Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering?

2006-09-18 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asset Voting cuts through this mess, wasting *no* votes except those that are wasted, deliberately or through negligence, by candidates receiving the votes, who refuse or are unable to combine excess votes with those from other candidates to create winners. In

Re: [EM] Establishing an offline foundation for secure online voting

2006-09-25 Thread raphfrk
otection only works if you "spend" the coin more than once at the same web site. --- Unrelated to the above, has anyone else noticed that posts seem to appear on the web archive before they are mailed ? This really slows down replying to emails. -

Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections

2006-09-29 Thread raphfrk
for range or plurality though. Btw, in the paper linked, the voting method covered is plurality. Being able to cast plurality type ballots would be required to be able to handle something like asset voting or party list voting too, so it is a feature that would be useful.

[EM] Giving different voting weights to different people

2006-09-30 Thread raphfrk
ates get less than 2 seats in the Senate in the US constitution. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

Re: [EM] Giving different voting weights to different people

2006-10-01 Thread raphfrk
is exactly that they don't be given any power. This means that there needs to be a way to assign power. If consensus is reached, then it doesn't matter (much) what form that takes. However, it is the default option for when consensus is not reached. Raphfrk Interesting si

Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections

2006-10-01 Thread raphfrk
he voter can pick their own ID numbers in the same way. Also, they should probably be provided with a die as people aren't that good at picking random numbers. Obviously, the voters would be told to leave the handles in the "default" state when finished with them. Raphfrk -

Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections

2006-10-03 Thread raphfrk
rcion. STENCILS: --One more thing. Raphfrk on this forum suggested some ideas about sliding widgets and 3ballot. I thought his stuff (assuming raphfrk is a "him") was rather kludgy and confused and I wasn't even sure it would work It would :). The main issue is getting ID nu

Re: [EM] fix to Rivest 3-ballot flaw! very simple

2006-10-04 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I posted it on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RangeVoting/ Summary for those that don't want to go to the RangeVoting List The method amounts to allowing the voter to vote FOR two candidates and AGAINST 1 candidate. The AGAINST vote is a FOR vote for all the

Re: [EM] 3ballot - simplification for range

2006-10-04 Thread raphfrk
many votes they cast for each candidate. This also slightly reduces the security as a voter may forget how many they cast for a specific candidate. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new f

[EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system

2006-10-04 Thread raphfrk
Dharma (subscribed lists) wrote: What are the views on this sort of electoral system - is it proportional representation or disproportional. the top 2 parties gets 40% of the seats each and the the 3rd party gets 20% The result, assuming the following numbers of electors: A - 30 B - 90

[EM] Separation of Powers taken to the extreme

2006-10-06 Thread raphfrk
be people more interested in quality laws. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. election-method

Re: [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system

2006-10-09 Thread raphfrk
Dharma wrote: raphfrk at netscape.net [mailto:raphfrk at netscape.net] Dharma (subscribed lists) wrote: What are the views on this sort of electoral system - is it proportional representation or disproportional. the top 2 parties gets 40% of the seats each and the the 3rd

Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods)

2006-10-18 Thread raphfrk
rent holder. However, if asset voting is used, then there is no point in doing IRV as well. I guess it could be used as a deadlock breaker or something. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com -Original Messa

Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods)

2006-10-19 Thread raphfrk
in condorcet ? DWK Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. election-metho

Re: [EM] vote pact

2006-10-20 Thread raphfrk
eople who happen to be part of the main party effectively get a larger share of the budget. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading s

Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods)

2006-10-23 Thread raphfrk
references. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. election-methods mailing list - see http://electo

Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation

2006-10-31 Thread raphfrk
for that candidate. The voter's ballot rates each candidate from 0-10. He then adds in the voter's vote and records any increased the utility of the election due to the voter having an effect. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wik

Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation

2006-11-01 Thread raphfrk
stake back). You get to repeat the gamble as often as you want, but can only use your initial stake and any money you win. What is the optimal amount to bet in order to maximise the rate of income. Clearly, if you bet all your money you will with near certainty be bankrupt after say, 10 rounds.

Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)

2006-11-01 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : A voter might be willing to use option C even though D gives a better expected value. In my opinion, if the voter prefers to vote option C than option D, because he doesn't want to risk the -1 outcome, then he has not

Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)

2006-11-01 Thread raphfrk
that there would be people in an election who wouldn't vote perfect strategic because they are afraid that their least favorite will win. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB

Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk)

2006-11-02 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) At 05:12 PM 11/1/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is why insurance companies exist. People pay say 1% of the value of a thing in order to insure against a risk that is say 1

[EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits

2006-11-03 Thread raphfrk
er, the election for office itself would be PR based. The ballot access election districts might cover 10% of the country. In the US, they could even be the States. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com

[EM] using single seat elections as a first stage for a PR election

2006-11-03 Thread raphfrk
who have won at least one ballot access election are allowed to stand for office. However, the election for office itself would be PR based. The ballot access election districts might cover 10% of the country. In the US, they could even be the States. Raphfrk Inter

[EM] Electoral college competition rule

2006-11-07 Thread raphfrk
t does suffer from the problem that it is in party A's interests to declare itself as A and A'. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry

[EM] Thompson insurance like voting for a legislature

2006-11-07 Thread raphfrk
formula for the fractions can be almost anything and doesn't have to be what I gave. It is supposed to represent the probability that the bill will pass/fail. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the

Re: [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings

2006-11-13 Thread raphfrk
ll list without fear that they will hurt their first choice. Raphfrk Interesting site "what if anyone could modify the laws" www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

[EM] Combating the Approval Burr dilemma

2006-11-16 Thread raphfrk
pretty complex. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus

Re: [EM] Combatting the Burr dilemna

2006-11-17 Thread raphfrk
) Result: A2 wins I think may suffer from alot of issues depending on how the intra pact voting works. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] Apportionment (biased?) let me add some more confusion to the mix :)

2006-12-11 Thread raphfrk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One more tool that can be useful in some situations is the hierarchical structure of the states/parties. To guarantee that certain set of states/parties will not be underrepresented they could form a team/alliance. When seats are allocated to that team they

Re: [EM] Simulation of political identity space in voting

2006-12-12 Thread raphfrk
be defined by the person who submits the voting method. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB

Re: [EM] Simulation of political identity space in voting

2006-12-12 Thread raphfrk
Also, what is interesting is that condorcet has alot less noise than max utility. I guess this is due to median being more resistant to noise than average. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

[EM] PR-STV Strategic Vulnerability

2006-12-15 Thread raphfrk
be to require that the entire election is re-run whenever a candidate is eliminated. This means that voting for a no-hoper is a waste of time as ultimately, he will be eliminated and your vote will count for your true first choice anyway. Raphfrk Interesting site

Re: [EM] simulator code for 2 Approval methods

2006-12-15 Thread raphfrk
]; second_place = i; } } } delete [] talley; delete [] thresh; if ( winnerR ) { *winnerR = winner; *(winnerR+1) = second_place; } // return pickOneHappiness( they, numv, winner ); } Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

Re: [EM] RE : Re: simulator code for 2 Approval methods

2006-12-16 Thread raphfrk
forwards. If candidate order matters, then there would be areas which are solid mixed colour. I think the 'poll' case should be alot better as it will allow the virtual voters to place their threshold better. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify

Re: [EM] Would would you say about a method that gives a seat to a 1-person state?

2006-12-18 Thread raphfrk
for Webster, then settling for Hill isn't a major additional compromise. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail

Re: [EM] Simulator source package available

2006-12-18 Thread raphfrk
every time) Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus

Re: [EM] Simulator source package available

2006-12-18 Thread raphfrk
I tried compiling it on cygwin by copying Linux.make to CYGWIN_NT-5.1.make. It wasn't able to find random(). Is this a standard function that my (admittantly slightly out of date) gcc doesn't have ? Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

Re: [EM] lots of code/logs wrt simulation code

2006-12-19 Thread raphfrk
: At global scope: ResultFile.h:57: type specifier omitted for parameter `u_int32_t' and lots more Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out

Re: [EM] updated graphs

2006-12-19 Thread raphfrk
with all its flaws, it is giving pretty close to condorcet while at the same time being strategic. It looks like the problem occurs for 3 way ties, as was suggested. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com -Original

Re: [EM] simulation graphs, zoomed out

2006-12-20 Thread raphfrk
result than the previous run. I added it to a geocities webpage. www.geocities.com/raphfrk I only ran 2 sims and only with 50 voters, so there is alot of inherent noise. However, some of the 'noise' is just blending of 2 edges due to the ties. The result is symmetric unlike the previous case

Re: [EM] simulation graphs, zoomed out

2006-12-21 Thread raphfrk
based on number of wins in all poll runs 5) goto 2 (maybe do 10 cycles) 6) Run main election using expected utility from all the polls This should stabilise on 1 candidate in the limit. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

Re: [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts

2006-12-21 Thread raphfrk
policy of the electorate. I am not entirely convinced that that is fair for something like spending tax money as 51% of the legislature should not be allowed to spend 100% of the money, but that is a separate issue. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could

[EM] Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures

2006-12-22 Thread raphfrk
Btw, how hard is it to calculate the voronoi diagram ? It might be interesting to have the simulation automatically overlay the voronoi diagram lines on the results (maybe have it as a switch). This assumes there is concensus that the voronou digram is the optimal result. Raphfrk

Re: [EM] Election methods in student government...

2006-12-22 Thread raphfrk
that is a good use for the vote. It also gets the stability/simplicity of a peer assembly for actual debates. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] RE : RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures

2006-12-23 Thread raphfrk
of the gaussian have a non-gaussian distribution. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage

Re: [EM] updated sims

2006-12-25 Thread raphfrk
It might be worth having a one line explanation for the methods. Most of them could be interpreted more than one way. Also, it might be worth pointing out that most of them assume honest voters. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

Re: [EM] Election methods in student government...

2007-01-02 Thread raphfrk
then move around the votes after the election in order to give PR. You can't get much less complex than that. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw

2007-01-23 Thread raphfrk
that the NPV Compact actually explicitally state that that is what they are doing. The Compact States would have some method for selecting what voting method they want to use and then all results from all States would be mapped to that voting method as accurately as possible. Raphfrk

Re: [EM] Hay Voting busted

2007-02-05 Thread raphfrk
be resisted for philosophical reasons. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry

Re: [EM] Hay voting simulated in IEVS

2007-02-06 Thread raphfrk
It might be worth trying it with various parameter settings. With P-1.0, does it get better ... and/or does it just become random ballot ? Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] L1 distance, Condorcet, etc [Ossipoff]

2007-02-21 Thread raphfrk
://tuzakey.com/~scott/2dimensional-median-counter.png The axes are supposed to represent issues. This means that they are not set arbitrarily. Rotating the axes would represent mixing issues, which is against the whole point using city-block distance. Raphfrk

Re: [EM] Why does IRV but not delayed top-two runoff lead to 2-party domination?

2007-02-23 Thread raphfrk
and random ballot. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email

Re: [EM] When and how can we speak of individual utility and social utility?

2007-02-23 Thread raphfrk
, the supply of bread may decline because the baker, who has more bread than he needs always ends up having them allocated to someone else. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy

2007-03-02 Thread raphfrk
, it is possible to have a bill passed and then use your remaining votes to block it being repealed. Also, I would suggest that under that system that multiple bills be passed at once. This allows compromises to be proposed. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could

Re: [EM] very simple email poll

2007-03-04 Thread raphfrk
better to a random choice of A or B. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage

Re: [EM] it's pleocracy, not democracy

2007-03-06 Thread raphfrk
be to use Asset Voting for the assembly. PR-STV achieves (or near achieves) the same thing. The main problem was that the Unionists and Nationalists didn't like each other. Very few systems would work in that case. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone

[EM] MIT News: Math of elections says voters win with 'winner take all'

2007-04-14 Thread raphfrk
vote needed for the 2 parties to win. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading

[EM] PR in student government...

2007-04-16 Thread raphfrk
, this leads to some randomness. It might be easier to explain. The real problem with PR-STV is the fractional transfers. They are not very easy to explain. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] PR in student government

2007-04-17 Thread raphfrk
James Gilmour jgilmour at globalnet.co.uk raphfrk at netscape.net Sent: 16 April 2007 20:08 It might be easier to explain. The real problem with PR-STV is the fractional transfers. They are not very easy to explain. Fractional transfers are absolutely essential for STV-PR (unless you

Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 34, Issue 22

2007-04-19 Thread raphfrk
:) ). In PR-STV with equal rankings allowed, is it normal to re-calculate the fraction when a candidate is eliminated (or elected)? Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 34, Issue 24

2007-04-20 Thread raphfrk
. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection

Re: [EM] PR-STV and vote management

2007-04-20 Thread raphfrk
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax abd at lomaxdesign.com Fri Apr 20 07:55:43 PDT 2007 At 01:18 PM 4/19/2007, raphfrk at netscape.net wrote: I was thinking about an easier solution to the vote management problem. This is where it is sometimes in a party's interests to try to split their support

Re: [EM] Student government - what voting system to recommend?

2007-04-22 Thread raphfrk
?) candidate but prefers him to the major parties. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage

[EM] Ballot list published in Ireland?

2007-04-28 Thread raphfrk
I have a vague memory that as part of the electronic voting pilot scheme (3 constituencies) in Ireland, they published a file containing a listing of all the ranked ballots cast. Am I misremembering and if not does anyone have a link ? Raphfrk Interesting site

[EM] danger of coercion (Re: First U.S. Scientific Election Audit...)

2007-05-14 Thread raphfrk
. Something similar could be used in a town meeting type setting. OTOH, it might break the consensus building effect of the town meeting. If there is no penalty in acting to prevent consensus, then it is less likely to occur. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone

[EM] stratified renormalisation for elections

2007-05-21 Thread raphfrk
group would be coloured slightly differently, if one group is over/under-represented, then renormalisation could be applied. Obviously, the characteristics for the groups would have to be clearly defined. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

[EM] stratified renormalisation for elections

2007-05-23 Thread raphfrk
more money to medicare, and homecare. Allowing people form there own group would help here.? Also, this seems to be a well defined situation, so could be used by the group allocation system. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws

[EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid

2007-05-27 Thread raphfrk
to the most popular of A,B and C.? By splitting the voter once it goes to an elected candidate, proportionality is maintained. Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com

[EM] Presidential debate ordering

2007-06-03 Thread raphfrk
.? No candidate will agree to debate with certain candidates who they find (or claim to find) unsavory. I guess if a large media organisation ran it, they might be able to swing it. Who currently runs the US presidential debates ? Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone

Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 37, Issue 4

2007-07-05 Thread raphfrk
that once the point has been found, it is tested to confirm convergence.? (When in the X(n+1) = f(X(n)) 'mode'). Raphfrk Interesting site what if anyone could modify the laws www.wikocracy.com