On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:17:52AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I removed the reference from the dwarf.h file, but don't agree the
constants alone are enough to know where one can find real information
(at least I often spend a lot of time trying to hunt down information on
obscure DWARF
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:14 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Here is a patch for readelf raw .debug_macro reading.
The output is like .debug_macinfo, but the format was different enough
to just add a new section parsing function.
I merged and pushed this part now.
The new .debug_macro format has
Here is a patch for readelf raw .debug_macro reading.
The output is like .debug_macinfo, but the format was different enough
to just add a new section parsing function. The vendor extension opcode
table code isn't really tested since there are no examples out there yet.
But I had some idea for
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 18:14 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
dwarf.h should get all the new constants
I added the new constants in a followup commit.
and it doesn't need comments with
references. The DW_*_GNU_* names are enough to know what to look up.
I removed the reference from the dwarf.h
Hi,
This adds minimal low-level support for .debug_macro/DW_AT_GNU_macros as
proposed here http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=110722.1 and
implemented in gcc 4.7 (-g3). It is just enough to not barf on it when
we encounter the new attribute and to sanity check the attribute form
offsets.
dwarf.h should get all the new constants, and it doesn't need comments with
references. The DW_*_GNU_* names are enough to know what to look up.
If we can support the new format entirely with the existing libdw API, then
I agree that is the right thing to do.
Thanks,
Roland
