Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks messy, but I don't know whether there is a better approach.
I'll need to think about it more. Of course, Jonas is the boss.
There are three reasons to have separate data formats for the
interlink protocol and for internal use in
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:15:25AM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
What if we introduced a separate routine to convert term_event
to interlink_event, so as to minimise change to handle_interlink_event?
I don't see how that
Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about a separate routine to convert from interlink_event
to term_event?
For EVENT_KBD, the conversion from interlink_event to term_event
can be many-to-many if CONFIG_UTF_8 is not defined. I don't
think it would be a good idea to
