Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-19 Thread Chris Jones
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:41:55PM EDT, Mayuresh wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:36:16PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: Other options is to check out the ouput from lynx w3m... though I doubt they do better than ELinks. Checked already. I prefer elinks output. I did a quick test as well

Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-18 Thread witekfl
The ELinks from the master branch draws nice looking frames in dumps. ___ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users

Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-18 Thread Chris Jones
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:04:10AM EDT, witekfl wrote: The ELinks from the master branch draws nice looking frames in dumps. Now you're telling me.. :-) I indeed see it in the NEWS file: * enhancement: ``elinks --dump'' uses box-drawing characters if * supported by the charset. I haven't

Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-18 Thread Mayuresh
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:51:18AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: | $ elinks -dump-width nnn -dump URL | lpr -P PDF Will try that out. Thanks. Not sure how it would know it should fill the gaps left between line drawing character though. Only other thing that comes to mind is that if it's just

Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-18 Thread Mayuresh
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:36:16PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: Other options is to check out the ouput from lynx w3m... though I doubt they do better than ELinks. Checked already. I prefer elinks output. Mayuresh. ___ elinks-users mailing list

Re: [elinks-users] Printing - no not the dump way

2012-05-17 Thread Mayuresh
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:18:49PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote: Any way to print as it appears in elinks? maybe the cups-pdf package.? How would that print as it appears in elinks? Does elinks have interface with it? I have tried html2ps as well as printing to pdf from firefox etc. Point is