Re: [O] [babel] Code for simple set-operations on two tables. Asking for some input.

Am 27.12.2011 21:53, schrieb Eric Schulte: Marc-Oliver Ihmmarc-oliver@online.de writes: Hello, Please find attached the elisp-file and a tutorial (as an org-file) for org-babel-table-proc. It provides some simple set-operations (mostly merge and intersect), which treat org-mode tables

Re: [O] Orthogonality of blocks

On 27/12/11 21:12, Christian Moe wrote: will do it in HTML. Full example follows below. I'll leave LaTeX to those in the know... Thanks. This was the best solution for me. I quote because the abstraction boundary between how it's rendered and what I want to be rendered is getting fuliginous.

Re: [O] Bugs/features of accumulating property values when used with entries (concretely: in org-contacts)

Hi Seb, thanks for your help! 2011-12-26 15:50 Sebastien Vauban: Christoph LANGEch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: 2. accumulation doesn't work within the same entry; details follow: So when I changed the above contact entry to * Contact Name :PROPERTIES: :EMAIL:f...@bar.org

Re: [O] Bugs/features of accumulating property values when used with entries (concretely: in org-contacts)

Christoph LANGE ch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: Hi Seb, thanks for your help! 2011-12-26 15:50 Sebastien Vauban: Christoph LANGEch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: 2. accumulation doesn't work within the same entry; details follow: So when I changed the above contact entry to

Re: [O] Bugs/features of accumulating property values when used with entries (concretely: in org-contacts)

Christoph LANGE ch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: Hi Seb, thanks for your help! 2011-12-26 15:50 Sebastien Vauban: Christoph LANGEch.la...@jacobs-university.de writes: 2. accumulation doesn't work within the same entry; details follow: So when I changed the above contact entry to

[O] [PATCH] integration with bbdb 3.0

Hi Bastien, The following patch fixes linking bbdb 3.0 records. Let me know if the patch needs improvement. Take care, Ivan Kanis diff --git a/emacs/org/org-bbdb.el b/emacs/org/org-bbdb.el index 61f8258..ddb7e4a 100644 --- a/emacs/org/org-bbdb.el +++ b/emacs/org/org-bbdb.el @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@

Re: [O] Org-drill doesn't work...

JK == Joost Kremers joostkrem...@fastmail.fm writes: JK however, trying to run org-drill the next day, i got the JK following message: JK #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE JK 0 items reviewed. Session duration 0:00:00. JK Recall of reviewed items: JK Excellent (5): 0% |

[O] Emacs macros and capture

Hi, I'm seeing some weird behavior with my capture template setup. I have the following in my capture templates: (r Reply entry (file+headline ~/org/gtd/gtd.org Reply) * TODO %:subject :@respond:@email: \n %u\n %i\n %a\nFrom: %:from\nID:%:message-id\n %? :immediate-finish t)

[O] Enhancing table cell alignments and commenting columns (was Re: Orthogonality of blocks)

Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes: Charles Turner chtu...@gmail.com writes: @Jambunathan: Your examples render the blocks with sizes proportional to the contained text, rather than aligning as a table. I find that aesthetically displeasing :-( I am unable to understand what sizes

Re: [O] Enhancing table cell alignments and commenting columns (was Re: Orthogonality of blocks)

I think the colcookie lines could be enhnaced to also support t and / characters. IMNSHO, using #+ATTR_ODT: lines for commenting out columns will not only be cumbersome but also error-prone. A random thought: I think there will be more flexibility if the colcookies characters - l and r -

Re: [O] Orthogonality of blocks

If I look at the figures in the link provided, I am reminded of table.el tables. Put your different src blocks in table.el tables, this way even if you don't get fontification of src blocks atleast you will have a side-by-side output with both html and latex backends. Charles Turner