Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 12:00 PM John Kitchin wrote: > > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Max Nikulin writes: > > > >> Nicolas, concerning a new thread, I have an impression that you are > >> busy with over activities since you are participating in discussions > >> not so

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 3:41 PM John Kitchin wrote: ... > Regarding that org-cite adds an abstraction layer, how else could one > interpret this (from > https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html#cite-syntax) > other than abstraction: > > [cite/na/b:@key] or

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread John Kitchin
Max Nikulin writes: > On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote: >> citenum and bibentry are the only two I am not sure have a CSL analog. > > I read your messages once more and I should say that I feel some disagreement > of > this one (I removed most of it) and the earlier and longer one from

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread John Kitchin
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > John Kitchin writes: > >> I do not think it is productive for the community to say or consider it >> is a sad situation. Many good things have emerged from these >> discussions, even if it is not yet consensus on a solution. It is a >> complex problem,

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread John Kitchin
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Max Nikulin writes: > >> Nicolas, concerning a new thread, I have an impression that you are >> busy with over activities since you are participating in discussions >> not so frequently. So I am unsure at which moment it is appropriate to >> raise such

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread Vikas Rawal
I have updated the readme in org-ref to indicate you can use both > packages. > > Thanks.

Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0

2022-03-27 Thread John Kitchin
I have updated the readme in org-ref to indicate you can use both packages. Max Nikulin writes: > On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote: >> Vikas Rawal writes: >>> >>> From the perspective of a user, this was only meant to express a >>> sentiment that one finds oneself in a situation of

Re: [RFC] DOCT: Declarative Org Capture Templates (easier template syntax)

2022-03-27 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > 2. Extend the alist with new options, like ${keyword} expansion, hooks, >contexts, children, etc Maybe in a sequence of patches. For reference, someone proposed a patch to extend org-capture-templates and support per-template hooks:

Re: Problem with org-babel and geiser

2022-03-27 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: Hi Zelphir, > Geiser seems to work, if I use /bin/sh with some arguments instead of > GNU Bash. I have no idea it means to "use /bin/sh with some arguments instead of GNU Bash" in the context of Org Babel, Geiser, and Guile. Then, please see my other mail, the reply

Re: Problem with org-babel and geiser

2022-03-27 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Neil Jerram writes: Hi Neil! > What do you see if you add ":results output" to the "#+begin_src" > line, and then C-c C-c again? #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :results output verbatim (+ 1 1) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: : Geiser Interpreter produced no output > Did the patch help in your case? I had to

Re: #2 Org mode profiling meetup on Sat, Mar 26 (was: Org mode profiling meetup on Sat, Feb 26 (was: profiling latency in large org-mode buffers (under both main & org-fold feature)))

2022-03-27 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: >> The time will be the same: 9pm SG time (4pm Moscow; 8am New York; 1pm >> London). Sat, Mar 26 >> >> I will post the link to the meeting one hour before the meeting start. > > Here is the link https://teamjoin.de/Org-dev-profiling-20220326-d708k The recording is