Hi all,
trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with #+call.
The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just output
nil.
When I call pycalltest directly with C-c C-c it works even with a big function.
Is there a size limit when I use #+call ?
Thanks
Am 24.03.2012 um 20:00 schrieb Nick Dokos:
Martin Halder martin.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with =
#+call.
The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just =
output nil.
When I call pycalltest
Am 24.03.2012 um 20:00 schrieb Nick Dokos:
Martin Halder martin.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with =
#+call.
The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just =
output nil.
When I call pycalltest
Hi all,
question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could refer
to e.g. first line after second hline with @II+2.
Would like to calculate sum = vsum(@I..@II) and tax = sum * 0.08
Am I doing sth wrong ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
| article | price |
|-+|
Am 19.03.2012 um 16:32 schrieb Russell Adams:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Martin Halder wrote:
Hi all,
question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could
refer to e.g. first line after second hline with @II+2.
Would like to calculate sum = vsum(@I
Am 19.03.2012 um 16:56 schrieb Nick Dokos:
Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Martin Halder wrote:
Hi all,
question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could
refer to e.g. first line after second hline
Hi all,
was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
directly reference parts of the table inside the block or do I have to specify
each parameter as separate parameter ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
This is working:
#+tblname: data
| Name| John Doe |
| Address
Martin Halder martin.hal...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
directly reference parts of the table inside the block or do I have to
specify each parameter as separate parameter ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
Aloha Martin
Martin Halder martin.hal...@gmail.com writes:
Martin Halder martin.hal...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
directly reference parts of the table inside the block or do I have to
specify each parameter as separate
Hi again,
have traced it down to the following commit which introduces the problem
(thanks to bisect):
[3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305] Tables: Make @ and $ point to
row/column 1 in a stable way
Was there a change in the format or is it really a bug ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
If we're not just looking for a neat workaround for some special cases
anymore, but looking at making org-tables aware of time-like strings
by default, a better strategy than to convert them into integers might
be to translate them into Calc time format and back again.
After all, Calc
Hi all,
found some strange behavior which was working before as far as I remember.. I
am on commit 078c01b.
this is working correctly:
| 10 |
| 10 |
| 20 |
||
| 40 |
#+TBLFM: @$1=vsum(@1..@3)
this one with relative indexing (@-1) not: (value is changing every time the
formula is applied:
Hi Christian,
this is fantastic, already love lisp, thanks a lot.. now I have exactly what I
wanted.. additionally I needed the time format in industrial mode (1h = 100m =
100s), implemented in ihms.
Thanks,
Martin
| Date | Start | Lunch | Back | End | Sum | Ind |
Hi all,
some words of warning: this was written by an Emacs, Org, Lisp and Calc
newbie.. and congratulations on converting a vim user btw, org mode is great : )
I was trying to generate a simple table with time format hh:mm and auto
calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so I
I was trying to generate a simple table with time format hh:mm and
auto calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so I
thought this would be easy but ended up with the following.. it works
but is not beautiful (apply formula twice and same information
multiple times) and I
15 matches
Mail list logo