On 2009-08-23 11:58 +0100, Nick Bell wrote:
Org-mode is great and I'd like to commit to it. However, I'm held back
by the apparent fragility of data stored in org-files. For example,
it's easy to delete entire folded trees of data with just a couple of
keystrokes or a mouse click.
This should
Nick Bell mail at nickbell.org writes:
Dear List,
Org-mode is great and I'd like to commit to it. However, I'm held back
by the apparent fragility of data stored in org-files. For example,
it's easy to delete entire folded trees of data with just a couple of
keystrokes or a mouse
PT wrote:
Nick Bell mail at nickbell.org writes:
Org-mode is great and I'd like to commit to it. However, I'm held back
by the apparent fragility of data stored in org-files. For example,
it's easy to delete entire folded trees of data with just a couple of
keystrokes or a mouse click.
2009/8/23 Leo sdl@gmail.com:
On 2009-08-23 11:58 +0100, Nick Bell wrote:
Org-mode is great and I'd like to commit to it. However, I'm held back
by the apparent fragility of data stored in org-files. For example,
it's easy to delete entire folded trees of data with just a couple of
On 2009-08-23 13:27 +0100, Nick Bell wrote:
I'm trying to write a little function using before-save-hook to
compare the current buffer to the saved version and output the result
of diffstat, asking the user whether they want to go ahead with the
save or view the full diff. Or has someone done
Leo wrote:
On 2009-08-23 13:27 +0100, Nick Bell wrote:
I'm trying to write a little function using before-save-hook to
compare the current buffer to the saved version and output the result
of diffstat, asking the user whether they want to go ahead with the
save or view the full diff. Or has
