Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
>> At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:05 +0200,
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
>>>
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Yes, this should now work. Good c
On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Yes, this should now work. Good catch.
You method with the tag on the END line would even be har
At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
> > Hi Carsten,
> >
> > Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, this should now work. Good catch.
> >>
> >> You method with the tag on the END line would even be harmful, as it
> >> remo
On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Yes, this should now work. Good catch.
You method with the tag on the END line would even be harmful, as it
removes any text after the END line, up to the next heading.
Can you show me the use case for not
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Yes, this should now work. Good catch.
>
> You method with the tag on the END line would even be harmful, as it
> removes any text after the END line, up to the next heading.
>
> Can you show me the use case for not exporting inline tasks? Maybe I
> need
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Matt: Inline tasks are now always exported, the variable
org-inlinetask-export is obsolete. Export will look like
a description list item - in fact, the export uses internally
description lists.
Tha
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Matt: Inline tasks are now always exported, the variable
>org-inlinetask-export is obsolete. Export will look like
>a description list item - in fact, the export uses internally
>description lists.
Thanks for clarifying this. I had org-inlineta
On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:05 PM, bar tomas wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply and your help.
I also think in terms of containers, but I was trying to figure out if
it is possible to have a container that has both subcontainers and
content that is not contained in a subcontainer.
For instance, in
ok. Many Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Stephan Schmitt
wrote:
>
> bar tomas wrote:
>>
>> Thanks very much for your reply and your help.
>> I also think in terms of containers, but I was trying to figure out if
>> it is possible to have a container that has both subcontainers and
>> cont
bar tomas wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply and your help.
I also think in terms of containers, but I was trying to figure out if
it is possible to have a container that has both subcontainers and
content that is not contained in a subcontainer.
For instance, in XML, this is the notion of a
Thanks very much for your reply and your help.
I also think in terms of containers, but I was trying to figure out if
it is possible to have a container that has both subcontainers and
content that is not contained in a subcontainer.
For instance, in XML, this is the notion of an element with 'mixe
Andrew Stribblehill writes:
> So, about inline tasks... what are they for? I've read the code and know what
> they do, how to use
> them etc. But I don't know in what context people use them.
>
> Why were they created and where are they used?
I don't actually use inline tasks (yet) -- I just re
bar tomas wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Maybe I use orgmode in a quirky way, but I often find the need of
> tagging internal regions.
>
> I don't have a problem with a creating a heading but what I find
> sometimes inconvenient is that implicitely everything that comes after
> the created headingis in it's sco
So, about inline tasks... what are they for? I've read the code and know
what they do, how to use them etc. But I don't know in what context people
use them.
Why were they created and where are they used?
On Oct 8, 2009 9:28 PM, "Bernt Hansen" wrote:
Matt Lundin writes: > bar tomas
writes: >
Matt Lundin writes:
> bar tomas writes:
>
>> Is it possible to tag a region of text without creating a new branch?
>> I mean, for instance, if I have the following orgmode document structure:
>>
>> * item1
>> this is about item 1
>> bla bla
>> more about item1
>>
>> I'd like to give a tag to the
bar tomas writes:
> Is it possible to tag a region of text without creating a new branch?
> I mean, for instance, if I have the following orgmode document structure:
>
> * item1
> this is about item 1
> bla bla
> more about item1
>
> I'd like to give a tag to the bit 'bla bla', but the scope of t
16 matches
Mail list logo
