Le 06 Oct 2010 21:39, Matthew Leifer a écrit:
That is odd. texi2dvi should default to using regular latex. You usually
have to pass a -p option or use the alias texi2pdf in order to use pdflatex.
It might be that you have a LATEX environment variable set. In any case,
you can alter this
That is odd. texi2dvi should default to using regular latex. You usually
have to pass a -p option or use the alias texi2pdf in order to use pdflatex.
It might be that you have a LATEX environment variable set. In any case,
you can alter this behaviour by setting the LATEX environment variable,
How about introducing a #+LATEX_CMD: option in org-mode? (and default
to pdflatex)
Yes, please! I use xelatex almost exclusively since it has unicode
support for non-latin scripts. And increasingly, some will presumably
want to use LuaTeX, which I'm told is slated to replace pdflatex in
the
Hi,
I don't know if you are aware, but there is a utility called texi2dvi that
figures out how many times LaTeX, bibtex, etc. need to be run and
automatically runs them the correct number of times for you. It also has an
option -p that uses pdflatex and generates pdf instead of dvi. In my
On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Thanks for the patch! I would certainly have a better way to
process these
files.
I would certainly *like very much to have your* better way to process
it.
Sorry about that confusing sentence...
texi2dvi is also on my minimal MikTex system, I'd certainly love a
patch that uses it instead of a shell script (although I also have
cygwin too)..
On 2010-10-05 20:00, Matthew Leifer wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if you are aware, but there is a utility called texi2dvi
that figures out how many
On Oct 5, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Commit 59ba4125 lisp/org-latex.el raises warning during byte-compile:
In org-export-as-pdf:
org-latex.el:882:28:Warning: assignment to free variable `errors'
org-latex.el:882:47:Warning: reference to free variable `errors'
Fixed, thanks.
-
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for the patch! I would certainly have a better way to process
these files.
My questions:
1. Can we run bibtex only if we have an indication that it might be
needed?
Maybe by looking at the output of the first LaTeX run? Hmm, maybe this
would not work if only the
As soon as I can, I'll give the patch a test using XeLaTeX as well.
It'd be great to have this feature also be able to run xelatex instead
of pdflatex to support that toolchain as well (for its better UTF-8
support and OpenType font integration). I expect this to be easy,
because as far as I can
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos wrote:
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com wrote:
Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
I've been taught of a weird observation: the page number
indicated in
the TOC of
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos wrote:
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com wrote:
Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
I've been taught of a weird observation: the page number indicated in
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
