Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Sebastian Rose
andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com writes: Eric Schulte schulte.eric at gmail.com writes: The two separate mechanisms are confusion, but for now are necessary to allow org-mode users to evaluate some simple block types (like dot) on export without having to load up all of org-babel.

Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Schulte
Sebastian Rose sebastian_r...@gmx.de writes: andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com writes: Eric Schulte schulte.eric at gmail.com writes: The two separate mechanisms are confusion, but for now are necessary to allow org-mode users to evaluate some simple block types (like dot) on export

Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Schulte
andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com writes: Eric Schulte schulte.eric at gmail.com writes: Note that the solution I'm about to propose relies on the use of org-babel and #+begin_src dot blocks rather than #+begin_dot blocks. When in these situations I will often set the block so that