Re: [O] Emacs and tablet devices
On 07/28/2011 08:44 AM, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:59:18 +0200, Piter_ wrote: It may be not the best place to ask, but: How useful is emacs on tablet devices. I have been thinking about emacs and freerunner. But I have no clue how the keybindings work with it. Another possible device you might consider is the N850/900/950 series. I'm fairly certain there is a native emacs build for those that requires no special jiggery-pokery. I have an n900. Emacs and org work wonderfully for a small device. I'm using 23.2 compiled by Sander Boer on this list. The keyboard is easily remapped. The only downsides are the screen size speed. A task that takes 4 sec. to run on my laptop takes over 30 on the phone (iterating large tables and the like). Capture clocking make it very useful in the handheld, so useful that I just picked a 2nd device to have when my current one dies. I can't speak to tablets or the freerunner but I would think the lack of a real keyboard would be difficult to overcome.
Re: [O] advice re organizing todo agenda items
On 03/31/2011 06:41 AM, Steven Haryanto wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Filippo A. Salustri salus...@ryerson.ca mailto:salus...@ryerson.ca wrote: Samuel Nick, I'm using priorities now, but there's only 3 of 'em. I would prefer finer control over them if I were to continue using priorities in this way. Q: My reading of the doc is that there's no way to change the number of priorities org supports: we're stuck with A/B/C. Right? I believe you can change the list of priorities with this setting (which you put in your Org file): #+PRIORITIES: Low M High Whatever ... PS: Sorry for the double reply. I usually subscribe to mailing lists which set its Reply-To to list. HTH, Steven You can change it globally through M-x customize-group RET org-priorities I use 1-9 for finer control, it looks like you could go crazy with it if you really wanted! Tracy
Re: [Orgmode] Iterate many tables
Thanks for bringing this up, it would be a useful tool. I get an error using the functions as well org-recalculate-all-tables: org-recalculate-all-tables: Wrong number of arguments: (lambda (function) Apply FUNCTION to the start of all tables in the buffer. (save-excursion (save-restriction (widen) (goto-char (point-min)) (while (re-search-forward org-table-any-line-regexp nil t) (message Mapping tables: %d%% (/ (* 100.0 (point)) (buffer-size))) (beginning-of-line 1) (when (looking-at org-table-line-regexp) (save-excursion (funcall function)) (or (looking-at org-table-line-regexp) (forward-char 1))) (re-search-forward org-table-any-border-regexp nil 1 (message Mapping tables: done)), 2 org-iterate-all-tables: while: Wrong number of arguments: (lambda (function) Apply FUNCTION to the start of all tables in the buffer. (save-excursion (save-restriction (widen) (goto-char (point-min)) (while (re-search-forward org-table-any-line-regexp nil t) (message Mapping tables: %d%% (/ (* 100.0 (point)) (buffer-size))) (beginning-of-line 1) (when (looking-at org-table-line-regexp) (save-excursion (funcall function)) (or (looking-at org-table-line-regexp) (forward-char 1))) (re-search-forward org-table-any-border-regexp nil 1 (message Mapping tables: done)), 2 On 05/05/2010 03:37 PM, Johan Ekh wrote: Any idea what could be wrong? Error meassage: org-recalculate-all-tables: Wrong number of arguments: #[(function) S(OE~^eb^ÄÅÆ#f: Best regards, Johan On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com mailto:carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 30, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Johan Ekh wrote: Hi all, I have a series of tables in a single file. Each table have some fields that depends on fields in the previous table. Thus, if I change something in the first table, I must go down manually and recalculate (or iterate) each table. Is there a way to recalculate all tables in a file simultaneously? Hi Johan, This should work if the dependence is only backwards. (defun org-recalculate-all-tables () (interactive) (org-table-map-tables (lambda () (org-table-recalculate t)) t)) If you have dependencies in both directions, this might work (untested): (defun org-iterate-all-tables () (interactive) (let* ((imax 10) (checksum (md5 (buffer-string))) c1 (i imax)) (catch 'exit (while ( i 0) (setq i (1- i)) (org-table-map-tables (lambda () (org-table-recalculate t)) t) (if (equal checksum (setq c1 (md5 (buffer-string (progn (message Convergence after %d iterations (- imax i)) (throw 'exit t)) (setq checksum c1))) (error No convergence after %d iterations imax If it does, this could be added to org-hacks on Worg. HTH - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] [ANN] Exporter for taskjuggler
Christian I think this is interesting as well. I've been trying to get back up to speed with tj, it never fit my work flow before. If you had a few more example sub-trees, it would help. How difficult would it be to add gap duration to the export? thanks - Tracy On 04/06/2010 07:15 AM, Christian Egli wrote: Hi Carsten Thanks for your reply. I've been a bit stumped by the zero feedback on the mailing list. Maybe I should have added a few screenshots of fancy gant and resource usage charts :-). Carsten Dominikcarsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Christian, this look interesting. Should we put this into the contrib directory for now, or are you aiming for the Org-mode core? I'm getting all the paper work for the assignments done, so I guess we could put it into the core. I suppose this would give it more credibility. What more do you need for integration in the core? - Patches for the Makefile and modules customization? - A section in the manual? Thanks Christian ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
