Bastien writes:
Instead of adapting those function, I'd have a function to inline
external footnotes--and vice versa. This function would be helpful
in this case but in other situations too.
+1!
Yours,
Christian
Hi,
I need to copy subtrees between org-buffers, but `org-copy-subtree'
ignores footnotes (which is technically correct, I guess). Is there any
way to automate this?
--
Florian Beck
Not a direct answer to your question, but:
I find that inline footnotes solve a lot of problems:
locality of reference is a huge deal both cognitively and
for organization; they cannot be put in the wrong sections
by mistake; they can't get numbers mixed up; they can't get
deleted or commented
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
I find that inline footnotes solve a lot of problems:
Absolutly. The main reason I don't generally inline footnotes is that I
don't want to *see* them. Basically, footnotes are for readers that are
not my primary audience; sometimes footnotes are only
On 3/20/13, Florian Beck f...@fbeck.net wrote:
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
I find that inline footnotes solve a lot of problems:
Absolutly. The main reason I don't generally inline footnotes is that I
don't want to *see* them. Basically, footnotes are for readers that are
Hi Florian,
Florian Beck f...@fbeck.net writes:
Still, the original questions stands. Maybe `org-copy-subtree' and
`org-paste-subtree' could be adapted?
Instead of adapting those function, I'd have a function to inline
external footnotes--and vice versa. This function would be helpful
in
