On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, James TD Smith wrote:
Hi Carsten and Mikael,
On 2009-11-01 18:24:41(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Mikael, thanks for doing the testing!
Yes, thanks a lot.
James, do you want to integrate Mikaels changes? If yes, can you please do
so and let me know
Hi Manish,
On 2009-12-30 17:02:47(+0530), Manish wrote:
I cloned the repo at git://yog-sothoth.mohorovi.cc/org-mode.git but
did not find `misc-new-features' branch and could not find the changes
in the org-mode proper as well. The changes sound very interesting
and I recently found a need
Hi Mikael, thanks for doing the testing!
James, do you want to integrate Mikaels changes? If yes, can you
please do so
and let me know when and from where I can pull?
Also, if one of you would like to go through the trouble to adapt the
XEmacs
version, that would be very nice.
Thanks!
Hi Carsten and Mikael,
On 2009-11-01 18:24:41(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Mikael, thanks for doing the testing!
Yes, thanks a lot.
James, do you want to integrate Mikaels changes? If yes, can you please do so
and let me know when and from where I can pull?
I've already applied the
Thanks for a very good explanation, now I understand and I have tested
it successfully. Looks like it works perfectly well to me.
The interactive function org-columns-new also works as expected.
This is a very good addition and I think it can be useful in many
different areas. It also opens
I will give this patch a try!
--
Mikael Fornius
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Maybe someone other than me should test this because I am not sure if I
understand it correctly?
The only reference to age or creation time I can find is in the
documentation string of org-sort-entries-or-items.
... creation time, which is assumed to be the first inactive time stamp
at the
Mikael Fornius m...@abc.se writes:
Maybe someone other than me should test this because I am not sure if I
understand it correctly?
The only reference to age or creation time I can find is in the
documentation string of org-sort-entries-or-items.
Now I found a reference in ChangeLog, SINCE
Hi Mikael,
On 2009-10-29 14:17:11(+0100), Mikael Fornius wrote:
Maybe someone other than me should test this because I am not sure if I
understand it correctly?
The only reference to age or creation time I can find is in the
documentation string of org-sort-entries-or-items.
...
Hi Mikael,
On 2009-10-29 21:10:50(+0100), Mikael Fornius wrote:
Mikael Fornius m...@abc.se writes:
Maybe someone other than me should test this because I am not sure if I
understand it correctly?
The only reference to age or creation time I can find is in the
documentation string of
Hi James, hi everyone,
this is a reasonably complex patch - could we get some volunteers
putting this to the test?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 26, 2009, at 1:04 AM, James TD Smith wrote:
I posted a patch to the list in July which added two new special
properties
intended for displaying the
Hi Carsten,
On 2009-10-28 18:01:44(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
this is a reasonably complex patch - could we get some volunteers
putting this to the test?
If anyone wants to test this, please pull from my git repo; there's a couple of
missing brackets in this patch.
James
--
|-James TD
I posted a patch to the list in July which added two new special properties
intended for displaying the age of an entry in column view. After some
discussion with Bastien (who was maintainer at the time) we decided I would
reimplement this functionality using column summary operators. It took me a
13 matches
Mail list logo
