Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes:
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing
Hi Bernt,
could I ask you to only revert that patch in org-clock.el and
see if that is enought to fix it?
- Carsten
On Nov 9, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes:
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen
and
what in fact did
Okay - I'll get back to you on that.
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Bernt,
could I ask you to only revert that patch in org-clock.el and
see if that is enought to fix it?
- Carsten
On Nov 9, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca
Reverting just the org-clock.el patches seems to fix it too.
-Bernt
--8---cut here---start-8---
commit 01b1eb143f027bc6cdf54d95bd15fc03f2e03208
Author: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca
Date: Mon Nov 9 14:27:03 2009 -0500
Revert part of Use
Hmmm.
I do not understand why this makes a difference, but I will make these
changes. Thanks a lot.
This was on of the big-sweep changes that happen in Emacs all the
time, where someone thinks we should use this and that style.
This looked trivial, so I accepted the changes. Too early
I think it's because in my case I have two tasks in the same file I'm
clocking in.
* STARTED first clocking task
...
* TODO second clocking task
and updating the first clocking task moves the point in the buffer on me
so I lose my place (at the second clocking task). So clocking in the
second
