Gentle persons:
I've spent every waking moment of the last two weeks by my wife's side
after a massive infection put her into septic shock. Those of you who
know me know this isn't a play for sympathy (and please, please, please,
let's not fill this channel with responses to the news) but an
Detective work by Seb and Jepler seems to have located the cause of
the problem: Joint Number was being stored in an hal_bit_t.
What puzzles me is that halui jogging works fine in 2.5.2 despite the
problem being there too.
Do the master and 2.5 branches treat boolean types differently?
Does
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:56:47 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
I know the history of the development of LCNC. I don't want to rehash
why things are the way they are now. I just want to see them get
better as we move forward.
I was just fixing to spend a lot of time trying to
Hey, Matt. Don't get me wrong. I think LCNC deserves a better documented
history. I just don't want to see discussion about moving forward bog down
in it's the way it is now because... loops. It's important to know one's
history but it's also important not to let it paralyze the process. I got a
the history probably would be good, but what's important is coming up with
guidance for contributions in the future. I think most people just want to
help and don't really care about any of these issues.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Kent Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, Matt. Don't
On 13 March 2013 19:28, Senthil Seveelavanan s.seveelava...@gmail.com wrote:
My user name is Chendy for the forum. I have forgotten my password,
I can't see any sign of your ID on the forum list.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
On 03/13/2013 11:04 PM, Matt Shaver wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:45:03 -0500
John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
The 'zeromq' package for Fedora states the license is LGPLv3, without
adding 'with exceptions' as other packages do.
Chris Radek points out in another thread that if you
