Re: [Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

Jon The point about MK breaking out HAL is that makes it easier for us to incorporate it, not that it makes it easier for people to do HAL-only projects. Breaking out HAL for us (surely) in the long run would be helpful. Linuxcnc and MK's strengths come a lot from being modular and this is a

Re: [Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

On 09/08/2018 07:27 PM, Chris Morley wrote: Jon I'm not sure where they are at with replacing NML, but that is not what I was talking of. They have split the cnc stack from the HAL stack HAL is what I am talking of, which would include the realtime code I suppose. Anybody, NOW, can download

Re: [Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

Jon I'm not sure where they are at with replacing NML, but that is not what I was talking of. They have split the cnc stack from the HAL stack HAL is what I am talking of, which would include the realtime code I suppose. (Talking above my pay grade but to summarize) Because of their

Re: [Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

On 09/08/2018 02:05 PM, Chris Morley wrote: There are very smart and hard working people on both projects, it would be nice to benefit both projects. I _THINK_ that the biggest thing they have done is to replace NML with 0mq. While I don't know the details at all, NML ships the

Re: [Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

On Saturday 08 September 2018 15:05:48 Chris Morley wrote: > I see that machinekit has broken out HAL and cnc (Well and lots of > others) into different repositories. > > https://github.com/machinekit > > [https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/6759549?s=280=4]ithub.com/machinekit> > >

[Emc-developers] Breakout of HAL/ machinekits's HAL

I see that machinekit has broken out HAL and cnc (Well and lots of others) into different repositories. https://github.com/machinekit [https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/6759549?s=280=4] machinekit · GitHub github.com GitHub

[Emc-developers] xemc not supported from 2.7 ... but can run on 2.7/2.8?? why not?

Fron long time I search for time to study better exchange signal from NML to gui for make my own GUI on c++ QT5 or QML java I have some instructions from Sebastian Kuminzky (very thanks) but at leas I have no time to study and develop these things. Recentely I have some time and i study

Re: [Emc-developers] unwanted x offset, and cannot be touched off to zero

On Friday 07 September 2018 20:31:27 Gene Heskett wrote: The offset I may have found. I was using position-cmd to drive x, maybe s/b motor-pos-cmd. Now homes to 0.000 I've put a limit3 between Z and lincurve.in wih a maxa of 3 & a smooth-step of 10 and its nice to feel x stepping in and out