On Wednesday 20 March 2019 23:38:02 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:03:43 -0400
> > From: Gene Heskett
> > Reply-To: EMC developers
> > To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Emc-developers] probably an
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:03:43 -0400
From: Gene Heskett
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] probably an un-answerable question
The little 8 oz plastic coke bottle can handle how many psi?
I'm
aprox 100psi beleave it or not
have a look on youtube oxtools tom lipton made a coolant mister using a
coke botle as pressure vessel like you have in mind may give you some ideas
On 2019-03-20 6:03 p.m., Gene Heskett wrote:
The little 8 oz plastic coke bottle can handle how many psi?
I'm
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 01:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> The little 8 oz plastic coke bottle can handle how many psi?
Many.
30 psi is less pressure than they hold when full of Coke (according to
the internet)
More info here;
The little 8 oz plastic coke bottle can handle how many psi?
I'm thinking of poking 2 holes in the lid, one to let the pressure in
from the air valve, and one to get the coolant back out of the bottle.
The pressure could easily be 30+ psi in the coke bottle, am I designing a
hand grenade?
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 16:14:26 Moses McKnight wrote:
> On 3/20/19 3:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 March 2019 15:29:10 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Moses McKnight wrote:
> >>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:45:42 -0500
> >>> From: Moses McKnight
> >>>
I kept two hawk eyes on it for a couple years.
Now I just use one eye but I still don't trust it completely.
:)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:12 PM Moses McKnight wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/19 3:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 March 2019 15:29:10 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 20
On 3/20/19 3:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 15:29:10 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Moses McKnight wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:45:42 -0500
From: Moses McKnight
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 15:29:10 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Moses McKnight wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:45:42 -0500
> > From: Moses McKnight
> > Reply-To: EMC developers
> > To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] removal of
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 14:45:42 Moses McKnight wrote:
> On 3/20/19 1:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Now we know of two victims. Stuart and I. :(
>
> Well, that would explain why it didn't get removed from distributions!
> 2 glitches out of 2 million installs (<-random number), and it is the
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Moses McKnight wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:45:42 -0500
From: Moses McKnight
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] removal of gedit as default editor
On 3/20/19 1:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now we know of two
On 3/20/19 1:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now we know of two victims. Stuart and I. :(
Well, that would explain why it didn't get removed from distributions! 2
glitches out of 2 million installs (<-random number), and it is the official
text editor for Gnome.
I suspect a third person
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 13:40:34 Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gedit scrambled a few files for me a few years ago. The next update
> seemed to have fixed it and I have had no problems for a while. I did
> start working on a copy only. That kept Murphy at bay.
>
Watch him carefully Stuart, that SOB
Gedit scrambled a few files for me a few years ago. The next update seemed
to have fixed it and I have had no problems for a while. I did start
working on a copy only. That kept Murphy at bay.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 8:52 AM andy pugh wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 13:00, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 13:00, Gene Heskett wrote:
How gedit ever made it into LinuxCNC as the default editor is
> immaterial, but when it was found to be a file scrambler it should not
> have taken several years to remove it.
I think it only ever scrambled files for one user.
--
atp
"A
On Wednesday 20 March 2019 07:06:36 Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> The second vid was so funny. I have seen/heard conversations like
> this. I am still laughing.
>
> Most likely, anyone understanding the joke will have NO problem with
> which editor to use. The choice of notepad or wordpad is a
The second vid was so funny. I have seen/heard conversations like this. I
am still laughing.
Most likely, anyone understanding the joke will have NO problem with which
editor to use. The choice of notepad or wordpad is a big decision in some
universes.
The choice of which screen 'Axis,
Hey everyone,
I skimmed through this discussion a bit, I use Pluma most of the time. In the
Linux world, the never ending war has been between Vim vs. Emacs. I don't use
either, ever. If I don't have a graphical environment going, I use nano, an
editor that absolutely everyone makes fun of.
18 matches
Mail list logo
