Done.
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/1319
-Greg
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 8:14 PM andy pugh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 23:50, Greg C wrote:
>
> > Attached is my proposed changes to G74 and G84 in the docs.
>
> Is it possible to submit it as a pull request at:
>
Ok no worries, I will submit the pull request. I wasn’t sure which was
easier so I erred on this side.
Thanks Andy!
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 8:14 PM andy pugh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 23:50, Greg C wrote:
>
> > Attached is my proposed changes to G74 and G84 in the docs.
>
> Is it
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 23:50, Greg C wrote:
> Attached is my proposed changes to G74 and G84 in the docs.
Is it possible to submit it as a pull request at:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pulls
(If not, we can still look at it, but it's harder)
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a
I'd like to see rigid tapping being able to be toggled with an m code or a
parameter I'm the cycle instead of calling g33.1. fanuc mills use m29
primarily, siemens just has a cycle option for floating holder or
synchronous tapping
Phil T.
The Feral Engineer
Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials,
On Monday 18 October 2021 18:37:43 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 10/18/21 11:42 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > On 10/18/21 5:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> kmod_module_remove_module() could not remove 'spi_bcm2835':
> >> Operation not permitted
> >
> > Thanks for the bug report Gene.
> >
>
Rainer,
Attached is my proposed changes to G74 and G84 in the docs.
Please let me know if you think anything about it should be changed.
I did think of adding the R- and L- explanations to G81 too. But I am
trying to refrain from going too far down the docs editing rabbit hole.
Let me know if
On 10/18/21 11:42 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 10/18/21 5:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
kmod_module_remove_module() could not remove 'spi_bcm2835':
Operation not permitted
Thanks for the bug report Gene.
I broke master, for rpi4 and everything else. Sorry! Fixing it now...
This is
пн, 18 жовт. 2021 о 21:52 Curtis Dutton пише:
> It is an FHA-32C-100-E250-C. I will be driving it with a mesa 8i20.
>
E250 is Incremental encoder with 4 wire 2500p/rev
https://www.harmonicdrive.net/products/rotary-actuators/hollow-shaft-actuators/fha-c
My fadal rebuild/retrofit is approaching completion. It's time to start
doing the harmonic drive encoder homework so I can build up a 4th axis.
I will be building a hostmot2 interface for the harmonic drive serial
encoder.
Does anyone know which protocol it uses? I remember someone mentioning
On 10/18/21 5:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
A linuxcnc -l now exits:
pi@rpi4:~/linuxcnc/configs/sheldon-lathe $ linuxcnc -l
LINUXCNC - 2.9.0-pre0-4802-g948693d0a
Machine configuration directory is '/home/pi/linuxcnc/configs/sheldon-lathe'
Machine configuration file is '7i90-axis.ini'
Starting
On Monday 18 October 2021 07:01:27 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Updated to master this morning, looks like raspbian is updating to
> bullseye as a rolling release as it installed quite a few new
> packages along with the latest linuxcnc.
> From the synaptic history:
> Commit Log for Mon Oct 18 06:37:57
Rainer,
Thank you for looking into it, very much appreciated!
Thanks,
Greg
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:00 AM Rainer Stelzer
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > Although, I do wonder if no X or Y are given, should L still be valid?
>
> totally agree.
>
> I retrofitted some machines with Sinumerik 810
Updated to master this morning, looks like raspbian is updating to
bullseye as a rolling release as it installed quite a few new
packages along with the latest linuxcnc.
>From the synaptic history:
Commit Log for Mon Oct 18 06:37:57 2021
Upgraded the following packages:
linuxcnc-doc-en
Hi Greg,
Although, I do wonder if no X or Y are given, should L still be valid?
totally agree.
I retrofitted some machines with Sinumerik 810 controls.
Tapping and rigid tapping are done with the same G code on this controls
but ask for different parameters.
In combination with a very
Good morning Rainer,
Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense.
Although, I do wonder if no X or Y are given, should L still be valid?
I will take a look at the docs later and see what I can do and submit a PR
to make it a bit more clear (at least for G74 and G84) for future “me’s”
:)
On Monday 18 October 2021 04:23:25 Rainer Stelzer wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> the L in a tapping cycle is not intended to tap the same location.
>
> In incremental mode and with a X or Y axis given, it taps at different
> locations.
> Handy when you do manual programming, confusing when you are used to
Hi Greg,
the L in a tapping cycle is not intended to tap the same location.
In incremental mode and with a X or Y axis given, it taps at different
locations.
Handy when you do manual programming, confusing when you are used to use
CAM tools.
It is explained in the G81 cycle.
The
17 matches
Mail list logo
