That sounds awesome Rod! I am interested in your Xenomai 4 test results.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 3:53 AM Rod Webster wrote:
>
> I was lucky enough to attend an Ethercat working group seminar today in
> Brisbane, Australia where German based Martin Rostan, Executive Director
> from the EtherCAT
this check should
> work if each tool get a unique number.
>
> Nicklas Karlsson
>
>
> fre 2023-01-13 klockan 16:39 -0500 skrev Small Shop Concepts:
> > That can be accomplished in the post processor of most cam softwares,
> > it
> > writes the tool lost at the
That can be accomplished in the post processor of most cam softwares, it
writes the tool lost at the top of the gcode file.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023, 4:32 PM Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
> Anyone else think it would be useful with possibility to show which
> tools a loaded NC file use?
>
> Then
I could see this being implemented in lights out machining facilities which
would be fantastic! Even low end 3d printers are utilizing this type of
remote interface which is great for letting machines run on there own and
keeping users updated as to issues or completion of prints so that the
Awesome! Thanks Steffan!
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022, 2:09 PM Steffen Möller wrote:
> This turned into quite a thread.
>
> @Kurt, you did everything just right.
>
> There should not be much of a difference between LinuxCNC-related work
> that is part of the same git repository, within the LinuxCNC
"How are integrators (ie, GUI / Panel designers) meant to pick between QtVCP
and the very similarly named QtPyVCP? They do the same thing,
fundamentally."
Does that even matter at the user level for gui selection?
I am not privy to why the two were divided and frankly could care less as a
" I consider all our users to be somehow part of our project and am
agnostic about the interface they are using. From how I see it, if
PyQtVCP does something better than QtVCP then QtVCP gets some
encouragement and ideas on how to improve and vice versa. Both
GUIsshould be as easy to install and
sage
> From: Jérémie Tarot
> Date: 2022-12-01 8:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Eye candy is important - Titan got a new German
> friend - want that reaction for a LinuxCNC controller
>
> Le jeu. 1 déc. 2022 à 16:47, Sm
I would agree that development tools in Linuxcnc is not ideal, I think
also in many cases it can bring a level of confusion to new users. I
also think that it should be weighed and a solution found to bring
those UI's that users would want to use into an easy to install
situation that did not
I think it would be great if QtPyVCP were included in Linuxcnc. I'm not
sure how you mean it would undermine qtvcp? Isn't Linuxcnc stronger with
more options for users? As the developer of Probe Basic and speaking on
behalf of the thousands of Probe Basic users out there I am sure they would
also
That sounds awesome! Tuned in to hear what everyone else thinks!
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 3:40 PM Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2022 um 11:58 Uhr
> > Von: "Jérémie Tarot"
> > An: "EMC developers"
> > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required.
>
Is there going to be an iso or other install method for 2.9? If so is
there an estimated time line?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, 5:43 AM andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 at 18:18, Chris Morley
> wrote:
>
> Is there any complete documentation of the process of releasing, so others
> > could try
Time for a official 2.9 stanle... :o I second! :)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022, 6:43 PM Rod Webster wrote:
> Yes please!
>
> Rod Webster
> *1300 896 832*
> +61 435 765 611
> Vehicle Modifications Network
> www.vehiclemods.net.au
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 07:00, andy pugh wrote:
>
> > Is it time
on Gitkraken for QtPyvcp we use the GLO Boards which is basically just an
item check list with some good formatting, this way it is recorded what has
to be fixed and strikes through once it has been completed. you can have
an overall running list and other lists so you could perhaps setup a DTG
I am not sure if it is reported yet, but I am experiencing a status bug in
which some m and g codes are not updating in status. This seems to be
affecting qtpyvcp's backplotter as well and is being reported by other
users as well. I verified the problem exists in axis prior to submitting
here to
15 matches
Mail list logo
