On 9/5/22 13:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 9/5/22 11:33, gene heskett wrote:
On 9/5/22 12:46, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Note that because of dependencies, 2.8 can't go into any distro
newer than Buster, and 2.9 (aka master) can't go into any distro
older than Bullseye.
uhh, Seb, 2.9 is
On 9/5/22 11:33, gene heskett wrote:
On 9/5/22 12:46, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Note that because of dependencies, 2.8 can't go into any distro newer
than Buster, and 2.9 (aka master) can't go into any distro older than
Bullseye.
uhh, Seb, 2.9 is running quite well on raspios buster. I just
On 9/5/22 12:46, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 9/5/22 04:56, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I do not see the LinuxCNC buildbot in conflict with the Debian-upload
of LinuxCNC. Ideally one would add the buildbot repository to the
Debian repository and then decides what version to install - and one
could
On 9/5/22 04:56, Steffen Moeller wrote:
I do not see the LinuxCNC buildbot in conflict with the Debian-upload
of LinuxCNC. Ideally one would add the buildbot repository to the
Debian repository and then decides what version to install - and one
could go back to the earlier version with no
developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Debian package - what is the future?
What has been overlooked so far is that there is still no buildbot version
for 2.9 on Bullseye so its increasingly difficult to deploy Linuxcnc on
newer hardware that requires say 5.10 kernel and higher. Buildbot
h another parallel release and potentially many(?) more users.
> I may be making a big deal out of nothing but I thought I'd ask others
> thoughts.
>
> Chris
>
> From: Rod Webster
> Sent: September 4, 2022 9:27 PM
> To: EMC developers
&
with another parallel release and potentially many(?) more users.
I may be making a big deal out of nothing but I thought I'd ask others thoughts.
Chris
From: Rod Webster
Sent: September 4, 2022 9:27 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Debian package
I would
> guess the time to go
> from pushed fix to Debian update would be quite some time though.
>
> Chris
>
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> Sent: September 4, 2022 6:00 PM
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net <
> emc-developer
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Debian package - what is the future?
On 9/4/22 10:36, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> There are currently four ways to get pre-built debs of linuxcnc:
>
> 1. debian.org
>
> 2. buildbot
>
> 3. www.linuxcnc.org<http://www.linuxcnc.org>
&
On 9/4/22 10:36, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
There are currently four ways to get pre-built debs of linuxcnc:
1. debian.org
2. buildbot
3. www.linuxcnc.org
4. github "artifacts"
I forgot to mention another important difference between the debian.org
debs and the buildbot debs:
The
On 9/3/22 23:53, Chris Morley wrote:
I see the action with Debian package.
I hope that gets us some more exposure and more develops/users.
Me too!
I did wonder what that means for the project as far as maintaining versions.
How are bug fixes addressed with Debian packages after (Debian)
Personally, I think it makes sense that when V2.9 becomes the release
version (eg replacing V2.8), V2.9 is pushed to the Debian version and
master branch will need to be built from source. Only bug fixes to the
released version would then be sent to Debian until lcnc releases a new
version.
It
I see the action with Debian package.
I hope that gets us some more exposure and more develops/users.
I did wonder what that means for the project as far as maintaining versions.
How are bug fixes addressed with Debian packages after (Debian) release?
Will Debian users be directed to the forum
13 matches
Mail list logo
