On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 at 19:10, andy pugh wrote:
> I am re-building with the config copied from the preempt kernel.
And it is now 33M. I will try it tomorrow and put it up on the server
if it works better.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the
On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 at 18:52, andy pugh wrote:
> But for whatever reason it isn't just the parport drivers that are
> missing, USB to serial is also absent. (So I can't program the STMBL)
I am re-building with the config copied from the preempt kernel.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 05:45, Alec Ari wrote:
> linux-image-4.14.174..> 2020-09-04 11:30 29M
> linux-image-4.19.195..> 2021-06-27 14:23 6.2M
>
> Any idea why the 4.19.195 kernel is 23MB smaller?
I think I see why, it's probably because the config is all wrong and
leaves lots of
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 05:45, Alec Ari wrote:
>
> One thing I noticed:
>
> https://www.linuxcnc.org/dists/buster/base/binary-amd64/
>
> linux-image-4.14.174..> 2020-09-04 11:30 29M
> linux-image-4.19.195..> 2021-06-27 14:23 6.2M
>
> Any idea why the 4.19.195 kernel is 23MB smaller?
Oh cool, thanks!
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
One thing I noticed:
https://www.linuxcnc.org/dists/buster/base/binary-amd64/
linux-image-4.14.174..> 2020-09-04 11:30 29M
linux-image-4.19.195..> 2021-06-27 14:23 6.2M
Any idea why the 4.19.195 kernel is 23MB smaller? Maybe they switched to XZ
compression for bzImage and
> On 1 Jul 2021, at 22:31, Alec Ari wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Just wanted to check in and see how the debs are doing.
They have been on the server for a few days now.
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi Andy,
Just wanted to check in and see how the debs are doing.
Thanks!
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
Lots of options are labeled as NEW even when then they've been in there for an
extremely long time, don't go by that all. When you reload a config, a lot of
those options will no longer say NEW. That's a menuconfig thing, not an actual
change to Kconfig source. I just ignore all of those.
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 06:17, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> The Multi-IO and PC-style hardware drivers date back at least to 2.6.12-rc2
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/parport/Kconfig?=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
Sorry. I
The Multi-IO and PC-style hardware drivers date back at least to 2.6.12-rc2
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/parport/Kconfig?=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 22:43, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
> Which drivers? How new are we talking, like 5.4 kernel drivers?
I haven't the faintest idea.
But if you tunnel down into the parport device drivers in menuconfig,
there are options to enable some "multi-io" boards, which
Andy,
Which drivers? How new are we talking, like 5.4 kernel drivers?
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 22:23, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> Heh! I will add PARPORT and PPDEV to the Kconfig patch the (0003 kernel
> patch) to make sure this won't happen again.
You might want to look at the other interesting new drivers, that look
like they might work for the
Heh! I will add PARPORT and PPDEV to the Kconfig patch the (0003 kernel patch)
to make sure this won't happen again.
Thanks!
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thursday 24 June 2021 16:25:09 andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:10, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
>
> wrote:
> > So what was the PARPORT fix for you? What was the issue? Were they
> > just turned off?
>
> Yes, they were just turned off.
>
> > If you loaded the debian kernel config,
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:10, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
> So what was the PARPORT fix for you? What was the issue? Were they just
> turned off?
Yes, they were just turned off.
> If you loaded the debian kernel config, then did debian actually disable
> PARPORT in their upstream
So what was the PARPORT fix for you? What was the issue? Were they just turned
off? If you loaded the debian kernel config, then did debian actually disable
PARPORT in their upstream kernel?
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 18:12, andy pugh wrote:
> (This core2duo all-in-one really does give good numbers:
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/kRSnairDtRLksUma7 )
Sorry, I just checked, it is a Core i3, 2800Mhz.
Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220T CPU @ 2.80GHz
Max Speed: 3800 MHz
Current Speed: 2800
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 10:08, andy pugh wrote:
> > I believe PARPORT and PPDEV need to be built as modules only.
It seems not. I have them as built-in and it's all looking good.
(This core2duo all-in-one really does give good numbers:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/kRSnairDtRLksUma7 )
Though that
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 10:00, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> One more thing,
>
> I believe PARPORT and PPDEV need to be built as modules only.
I will find out when I get home.
On the plus side there seems to be (new) support for some of the
multi-io boards that take a driver at startup.
One more thing,
I believe PARPORT and PPDEV need to be built as modules only.
Alec
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
Hi Andy,
LinuxCNC with RTAI always depends on CONFIG_PPDEV which depends on
CONFIG_PARPORT
That error is expected if that driver is off, previous versions it's the same
thing. For some reason, CONFIG_PARPORT and CONFIG_PPDEV are disabled. In the
past, you had those on hence no compiling
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 00:29, andy pugh wrote:
>
> Trying to compile 2.8 under the 4.19.195 RTAI kernel I get the output below.
> [/home/andypugh/linuxcnc-dev/src/hal_parport.ko] undefined!
> WARNING: "parport_claim"
Looks to be a real problem:
halcmd: loadrt hal_parport cfg="0x378"
insmod:
Trying to compile 2.8 under the 4.19.195 RTAI kernel I get the output below.
Is this usual at the moment, or something specific to my RTAI setup?
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.19.195-rtai'
WARNING: "parport_find_number"
[/home/andypugh/linuxcnc-dev/src/pluto_step.ko]
25 matches
Mail list logo
