Am 04.02.2013 um 08:25 schrieb Chris Morley:
Sure, you can say an EDM will never make a spindle synchronized
move, but changes to the motion module need to do sane things
regardless of what kind of a machine is being controlled.
What about different motion modules optimized
On Feb 4 2013 1:45 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 08:25 schrieb Chris Morley:
What about different motion modules optimized different classes of
applications?
Yes Peter I think your on the best track.
Unfortunately that's a big chunk of code to try and understand to
On Feb 3 2013 11:58 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
2013/2/4 sam sokolik sa...@empirescreen.com:
Oh - and this is kinda interesting...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTLs89YPtck
Follow and translate the link in the description.. (interesting
hack..)
If anyone needs translation from Russian:
Am 04.02.2013 um 10:25 schrieb EBo:
On Feb 4 2013 1:45 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 08:25 schrieb Chris Morley:
What about different motion modules optimized different classes of
applications?
Yes Peter I think your on the best track.
Unfortunately that's a big
On Feb 3 2013 10:21 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
EBo, your name rings a bell all the way back to Paul Corner EMC days,
you been arounf here a long time i think
Yes. Paul's nastiness is why I completely disengaged from EMC for a
*very* long time. It was the type of two faced - stab you in the
On Feb 4 2013 2:58 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 10:25 schrieb EBo:
LinuxCNC-3.0 then as a design philosophy?
I would rather call it sheer necessity in some cases, although
individual perceptions of urgency obviously differ.
For instance, I dont think broadening the base of
Am 04.02.2013 um 11:29 schrieb EBo:
On Feb 4 2013 2:58 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 10:25 schrieb EBo:
LinuxCNC-3.0 then as a design philosophy?
I would rather call it sheer necessity in some cases, although
individual perceptions of urgency obviously differ.
For
On Feb 4 2013 4:18 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 11:29 schrieb EBo:
On Feb 4 2013 2:58 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 10:25 schrieb EBo:
Well, I can see this going two ways. EMC works now.
well, the new RTOS branches do, too - sticking with that for the
Am 04.02.2013 um 14:11 schrieb EBo:
On Feb 4 2013 4:18 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 11:29 schrieb EBo:
In the past, and
I can read it between the lines now, that the invasiveness of the
modifications will take so much time and effort that lots of other
things gets pushed
On 02/04/2013 03:29 AM, EBo wrote:
Also, if people have not done it already, I
*strongly* recommend setting up a fully automated unit and regression
test suite.
We have a regression testing infrastructure and a pile of regression
tests. We have continuous integration setup that runs the
2013/2/4 EBo e...@sandien.com:
I do not have time to really crawl into his code, and have the
following question that I could see as being a problem: Can a long move
be interrupted and reversed? If so, how does it handle the
deceleration?
In the video it switches back and forth right in a
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013, at 09:43 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 um 14:11 schrieb EBo:
So my question to you is how long do you keep the 2.5 branch if/when a
3.0 branch becomes stable and fully functional? It should not be 0, but
it also should not be forever.
I dont know.
On 02/04/2013 04:18 AM, EBo wrote:
On Feb 3 2013 10:21 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
EBo, your name rings a bell all the way back to Paul Corner EMC days,
you been arounf here a long time i think
Yes. Paul's nastiness is why I completely disengaged from EMC for a
*very* long time. It was the
On 02/03/2013 02:59 PM, EBo wrote:
On Feb 3 2013 1:02 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
I don't know if the trajectory planner keeps the move history, if
it
does then it might be possible to allow negative adaptive feed.
Unfortunately negative feed would require major rework - there is no
history of
On 02/04/2013 04:18 AM, EBo wrote:
On Feb 3 2013 10:21 PM, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
EBo, your name rings a bell all the way back to Paul Corner EMC days,
you been arounf here a long time i think
Yes. Paul's nastiness is why I completely disengaged from EMC for a
*very* long time. It was the
Long story short I am looking at building a project that would likely
work best with EDM. I am looking at building a custom EDM head for a a
CNC router that is currently configured for 0.0001 step.
What I am trying to figure out is how to configure EMC so that the
electronics can return a
2013/2/3 EBo e...@sandien.com:
Long story short I am looking at building a project that would likely
work best with EDM. I am looking at building a custom EDM head for a a
CNC router that is currently configured for 0.0001 step.
What I am trying to figure out is how to configure EMC so that
On Feb 3 2013 4:47 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
2013/2/3 EBo e...@sandien.com:
Long story short I am looking at building a project that would
likely
work best with EDM. I am looking at building a custom EDM head for
a a
CNC router that is currently configured for 0.0001 step.
What I am
On 3 February 2013 13:39, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
What I am trying to figure out is how to configure EMC so that the
electronics can return a pause signal until it has burned burned
through the requested material,
Adaptive feed _might_ work, but there is no way in the current code to
run
On Feb 3 2013 4:57 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 3 February 2013 13:39, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
What I am trying to figure out is how to configure EMC so that the
electronics can return a pause signal until it has burned burned
through the requested material,
Adaptive feed _might_ work, but
On 3 February 2013 15:39, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
Short answer is that decades ago I was shown a EDM head that could self
retract a small distance
If this is purely a die-sinking application then I suggest not
bothering with G-code at all.
Do the whole thing in HAL with a custom
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, andy pugh wrote:
On 3 February 2013 15:39, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
Short answer is that decades ago I was shown a EDM head that could self
retract a small distance
If this is purely a die-sinking application then I suggest not
bothering with G-code
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:dengv...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:43 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, andy pugh wrote:
On 3 February 2013 15:39, EBo e
developers'
emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:dengv...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:43 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 06:57 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 3 February 2013 13:39, EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
What I am trying to figure out is how to configure EMC so that the
electronics can return a pause signal until it has burned burned
through the requested material,
Adaptive feed
: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:dengv...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:43 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, andy pugh
I don't know if the trajectory planner keeps the move history, if it
does then it might be possible to allow negative adaptive feed.
Unfortunately negative feed would require major rework - there is no
history of the path that has been executed. (That has also been
discussed at
Steve Stallings wrote:
SNIP
That would be Pete Gruendeman. We have not been
in contact since about 2008, a year after the
fest where he brought his setup.
I keep intending to get back to making something
more for EDM, but never seem to get the time.
Pete's system did not use EMC, but
On Feb 3 2013 1:02 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
I don't know if the trajectory planner keeps the move history, if
it
does then it might be possible to allow negative adaptive feed.
Unfortunately negative feed would require major rework - there is no
history of the path that has been executed.
On Feb 3 2013 1:02 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
...
Michael did a proof of concept on jog-while-paused once.
You can see it on Utube.
I just looked this up and the video does not move backward along the
jogged path, but straight to where it was before. I would expect that
with a wirefed EDM,
On Feb 3 2013 1:59 PM, ed wrote:
Steve Stallings wrote:
SNIP
That would be Pete Gruendeman. We have not been
in contact since about 2008, a year after the
fest where he brought his setup.
I keep intending to get back to making something
more for EDM, but never seem to get the time.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at the
point where it calls the low lever Catmull-Rom spline, and just evaluate
it in reverse. I do not know how difficult that would be, but it would
require the ability to move
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:08:37 -0500
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at
the
point where it calls the low lever Catmull-Rom spline, and just
evaluate
it in reverse. I do not know how
On Feb 3 2013 3:08 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at the
point where it calls the low lever Catmull-Rom spline, and just
evaluate
it in reverse. I do not know how difficult that would be,
For simple simker EDM I implemented reversing in a gcode loop sensing an
analog input:
http://code.google.com/p/sector67-sandbox/wiki/FrequencyBasedAnalogInput
this was simple for my application, could stand to be refined somewhat, and
would get complicated for anything but straight down/up.
-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at
the
point where it calls the low lever Catmull-Rom spline, and just
evaluate
developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at
the
point where it calls the low lever Catmull-Rom spline, and just
:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, John Kasunich wrote:
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:08:37 -0500
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration
Scott,
Thanks. I will look at this when I get a chance. I may end up
reworking an old Bezier spline driver module to straight step direction
code if it comes to that.
More later,
EBo --
On Feb 3 2013 7:17 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
For simple simker EDM I implemented reversing in a
@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo wrote:
possibly, but a more principled hack would be to interface it at
the
point where it calls the low
, 03 Feb 2013 17:08:37 -0500
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] custom EDM configuration questions
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013, at 03:59 PM, EBo
EBo, your name rings a bell all the way back to Paul Corner EMC days,
you been arounf here a long time i think
btw: mydynac ( and RayHenry's) approach could not reverse even 1 unit of
measure
the 'adaptive speed' method could only reduce forward velocity , can not
reverse at all
there was no
2013/2/4 sam sokolik sa...@empirescreen.com:
Oh - and this is kinda interesting...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTLs89YPtck
Follow and translate the link in the description.. (interesting hack..)
If anyone needs translation from Russian:
The way this works is a g-code filter, which
If anyone needs translation from Russian:
The way this works is a g-code filter, which generates a reverse
g-code for a particular g-code line and inserts it _before_ this
particular g-code line with a / symbol in front of it.
It seems like a change in Axis GUI script to redefine zoom-in
2013/2/4 Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
If anyone needs translation from Russian:
The way this works is a g-code filter, which generates a reverse
g-code for a particular g-code line and inserts it _before_ this
particular g-code line with a / symbol in front of it.
It seems like
Sure, you can say an EDM will never make a spindle synchronized
move, but changes to the motion module need to do sane things
regardless of what kind of a machine is being controlled.
What about different motion modules optimized different classes of
applications?
Yes Peter I
47 matches
Mail list logo
