Dear Members,
The 2016 IEEE 20th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI) will be
held from May 8 to May 11, 2016 in Turin, Italy.
On behalf of the SPI 2016 Standing Committee, it is my pleasure to invite
you and your colleagues to contribute papers, talks, exhibitions to the
event. Over the
Hi Ron:
>But, a capacitor charged to such an open-circuit
voltage need to also be rated for that voltage
(probably a DUH moment). Correct?
Yes.
>Is Table 2 of IEC 61201:1992 equivalent to Table
A.2 of IEC 61201:2007?
Yes.
>ECMA 287 Table 3.4 ES1 values decrease from 60
Hi Ron:
The values in Table 5 are taken, directly, from
IEC 61201, Table A.2 and Figure A.1 (notes 1 and
2). See Annex A, IEC 61201, for further
information about these values.
Upeak is not the correct term; the voltage is the
open-circuit voltage to which the capacitor is
charged.
EN61000-3-3 is transitioning from the 2008 to 2013 next June. Has anyone gone
through this and identified any major changes since the 2008 edition?
Is a retest in order for existing equipment?
Regards,
Mike
-
This message is
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your reply. And, neither would I be in line to be a guinea pig for
that, but that does remind me of the opening scene in Ghostbusters. :)
But, a capacitor charged to such an open-circuit voltage need to also be rated
for that voltage (probably a DUH moment). Correct?
I
Hi Rich,
Thank you for your patience. Acknowledged on my choice of wording.
No more clarification need on this. Thank you.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Compound Photonics
D | +1 (602) 883-8039
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015
Many thanks to Rodney Davis for his help with my Level VI USA Energy efficiency
enquiry.
Regards;
Ian McBurney
Design & Compliance Engineer.
Allen & Heath Ltd.
Kernick Industrial Estate,
Penryn, Cornwall. TR10 9LU. UK
T: 01326 372070
E: ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
Allen & Heath Ltd is a
Thank you to all for the comments on Stricter limits than legal (CISPR11, IEC,
etc.,).
Jerry Itzenheiser Jr
EMC Technician - Waukesha
GE Healthcare
Global Engineering Technologies
EMC Laboratory Waukesha
T + 262-548-2217
M + 262-720-8846
For all those more familiar than I with this standard, I would appreciate a
clarification.
I've just purchased EN 62368-1 (assuming IEC 62368-1, too) and have started
immersing myself in it, but in 5.2.2.3 (Table 5) ES1/ES2 voltage limits from a
charged capacitor appear to violate the ES1/ES2
Ralph –
I’m less familiar with the CEC, but the NEC does not preclude 208/120 V WYE
to a single-family home (residence). It all depends on how much one is
willing to pay the utility for the service and proper provisioning and
system design at the use location.
Peter Tarver
*From:*
Hi Ronald,
It may be helpful for you to purchase a copy of 62368-2, which has the
rationale for the requirements in 62368-1.
Others can provide more detail and probably explain better than I, but in
general Table 4 has voltage *or* current limits, and Table 5 has
capacitance *and* voltage
11 matches
Mail list logo