2
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED DoC and ETSI EN 301 489-1
of the standards to which they were tested.>
The trend is to not harmonise the -1 version of this (and other series) in the
future,
the -1 instead will be normatively referenced in any of t
March 2022 10:02
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RED DoC and ETSI EN 301 489-1
The trend is to not harmonise the -1 version of this (and other series) in the
future,
the -1 instead will be normatively referenced in any of the applied subparts,
that WILL be harmonised (once
years. It's also possible that EU legislation has changed during that time.>
Indeed, there is an urgent need to speed up the process of standards
creation/modification, as both have happened, though it is more a
process of iteration to get to a final acceptable result.
That said, the
the standards to which they were tested.>
The trend is to not harmonise the -1 version of this (and other series) in the
future,
the -1 instead will be normatively referenced in any of the applied subparts,
that WILL be harmonised (once approved).
By normatively referencing, the referenced
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:28:48 +,
Ryan Jazz wrote:
> We have a Short Range Device transmitter and corresponding receivers we
> install in various enclosures for which we have test reports from different
> US labs.
> Transmitter power is less than 10mW and uses the 2.4GHz band.
> The
es, number 05466247
From: Ryan Jazz
Sent: 25 March 2022 21:29
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] RED DoC and ETSI EN 301 489-1
Dear members,
We have a Short Range Device transmitter and corresponding receivers we install
in various enclosures for which we have test reports from differe
Dear members,
We have a Short Range Device transmitter and corresponding receivers we install
in various enclosures for which we have test reports from different US labs.
Transmitter power is less than 10mW and uses the 2.4GHz band.
The various reports issued show the ETSI EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2 as
7 matches
Mail list logo