: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
I too can vouch for doing the Bonding test to a few hundred amps using a
Sorensen DC supply (and calibrated V and I meters and stopwatch...)
-Ken
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Scott Aldous
<0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote:
o:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 7:11 PM
>>
>> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
>>
>>
>>
>> The test of 2.6.3.4 does get interesting for high current eq
, December 1, 2016 7:11 PM
>
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
>
>
>
> The test of 2.6.3.4 does get interesting for high current equipment. I
> have personally run this test only on equipment rated up to 50 A. Even
> th
manent.
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 7:11 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
The test of 2.6.3.4 does get interesting for high current equipment. I have
personally run this tes
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
Ken alluded to this before - alternately, 2.6.4.2 allows you to run the test of
2.6.3.4 for constructions that don't meet the requirements of Table 3E.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:42 PM, IBM Ken
<ibm...@gmail.com<mailto:ibm...@gmail.com&g
dous [mailto:0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 9:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
Ken alluded to this before - alternately, 2.6.4.2 allows you to run the test of
2.6.3.4
hursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM
To: Boštjan Glavič <bostjan.gla...@siq.si <mailto:bostjan.gla...@siq.si> >
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
Hi Bostjan!
Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied
gt;>
>>
>>
>> *From:* IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM
>> *To:* Boštjan Glavič <bostjan.gla...@siq.si>
>> *Cc:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
>>
@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:24 AM
> *To:* Boštjan Glavič <bostjan.gla...@siq.si>
> *Cc:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
>
>
>
> Hi Bostjan!
>
> Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied to this p
gt;
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] dimension of the stud for PE
Hi Bostjan!
Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied to this product?
I think it is justifiable to extend the protective bonding rules to the PE
connection; i.e. to pass the bonding test or to verify via insp
Hi Bostjan!
Can note (c) in Table 3E be applied to this product?
I think it is justifiable to extend the protective bonding rules to the PE
connection; i.e. to pass the bonding test or to verify via inspection that
the PE conductor is "not smaller" than the mains supply - but that's just
my
Dear experts
I hope there are some experts dealing with IEC 60950-1 standard. We have a
product that has rated input current 130A. Unit is intended for permanent
connection to mains and provide special terminals for 3 phases and bolt with
stud for PE connectio.
Question is how should we
12 matches
Mail list logo
