Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-03 Thread DLohbeck
So true, the TCF route is not intended to get around the requirements. It is mainly for large machines that can not be moved and products with numerous configuations that can not be fully tested, etc... Regards, David Lohbeck CE Marking Hanbook ---

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-02 Thread Andrew Carson
Message- From: Gordon,Ian [mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com] Sent: 02 May 2002 09:41 To: 'IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC' Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote: Also, EN 61326-1 lets you relax the performance criteria of the EMC tests for applications

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-02 Thread Chris Maxwell
[SMTP:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:41 AM To: 'IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC' Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote: Also, EN 61326-1 lets you relax the performance criteria of the EMC tests for applications that are not critical

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-02 Thread Gordon,Ian
Eric Lifsey (hellflo...@aol.com)wrote: Also, EN 61326-1 lets you relax the performance criteria of the EMC tests for applications that are not critical (e.g. if a random system crash isn't too objectionable for the particular use: such as a primarily diagnostic application that will be

Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-01 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in of0b8a9efb.3bd0b2ca-on86256bac.00399...@mmm.com) about 'CE MARKING A SYSTEM', on Wed, 1 May 2002: Contrary to popular opinion, the TCF route is not designed to get around standards. Indeed. It is intended, in one instance, to accommodate

Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-05-01 Thread reheller
.co.uk cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US) Subject: Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM 04/30/2002

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-04-30 Thread Alexandru Guidea
[mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:57 AM To: 'IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC' Subject: CE MARKING A SYSTEM Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D of C's claim light

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-04-30 Thread Gary McInturff
Subject: RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM Gordon, cosider constructing a Technical Construction File (TCF) and submitting it to a Competent Body. Your product may comply with the essential requirements when operating in its intended environment without the need to apply the full industrial strength tests

Re: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-04-30 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com wrote (in E1BA0362B28ED211A1E80008C71EA30601818F4F@EXC_EAS01) about 'CE MARKING A SYSTEM', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002: Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC to a system some of whose component parts

RE: CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-04-30 Thread richwoods
that argument to the CB. Richard Woods Sensormatic Electronics Tyco International -Original Message- From: Gordon,Ian [mailto:ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:57 AM To: 'IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC' Subject: CE MARKING A SYSTEM Can anyone advise the course of action

CE MARKING A SYSTEM

2002-04-30 Thread Gordon,Ian
Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D of C's claim light industrial immunity. However, the system has been running in very harsh environments e.g. plasma etch applications at customer

CE marking quality system

1996-05-01 Thread Peter E. Perkins
PSNet Regarding whether or not one must have an ISO 9000 registered quality system to apply the CE mark, some specifics are laid out for us... In the LVD, including the modifications by the CE marking amendment 93/68, states in concluding Annex IV - Internal Production Control: