I looked at it once but never did try it out. I don't remember why.
Thanks for the link
John
On 11 Nov 2009 at 13:33, Hubert Bahr wrote:
John Thornton wrote:
Is there any facility in your software to calcualte feed and
speeds for tools? I find this feature
very helpful.
I have four
On 11 Nov 2009 at 19:27, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Thanks John,
If I am using a servo with 512 PPR, is a step 1/512 of a revolution?
If your servo drives take step and direction signals then they are just like
steppers to the
software. If it takes 512 steps to go one revolution and it takes
I actually have the training video it was thrown in for a few dollars when they
talked me into
upgrading...
John
On 11 Nov 2009 at 13:07, Jon Elson wrote:
a...@conceptmachinery.com wrote:
hi
i am interesting in how much SharpCam software cost?
How this CAM software
On 12 Nov 2009 at 10:34, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
I ran your test code and sure enough when G64 is modal the
way you program it will cut the corner. A couple of things to
keep in mind when programming g code.
Always retract some distance above the material before doing
a lateral
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 06:25 -0600, John Thornton wrote:
On 11 Nov 2009 at 13:33, Hubert Bahr wrote:
John have you ever looked at Synergy by Weber Systems. This is what
I
use and it definately calculates feed and speed for your tools. You
do
have to tune it for your machine,
Gentlemen,
Instead of the parallel port or the NIC should we (someone) consider the
video connection as an alternative interface. I would guess not all the pins
are used and with some of the new programming tools it may be a viable
choice.
Just saying.
thanks
Stuart
--
Few will listen,
Of
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
Instead of the parallel port or the NIC should we (someone) consider the
video connection as an alternative interface. I would guess not all the pins
are used and with some of the new programming tools it may be a viable
choice.
Probably not :)
All of
Well rats - just goes to show what I know (or don't know).
Nothing ventured - nothing gained. At least I learned something today. :)
thanks
Stuart
--
Few will listen,
Of the few who listen, fewer still will understand,
Understanding does not mean believe,
Of the handful who believe, most may not
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Overall, you'd be better off just getting a Mesa card :)
Or, if you are not in a hurry, wait for the Beagle Board. Torsten is
working on
an RTAI port for it. I am hoping that the silence from him means he is
hard at
work, coding up the architecture-specific
Gentlemen,
I am in no hurry whatsoever. I just threw up a trial balloon to see the
comments. With the GPU speeds I thought it might be possible to take
advantage of that and solve some issues of connectivity.
thanks
Stuart
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
I am in no hurry whatsoever. I just threw up a trial balloon to see the
comments. With the GPU speeds I thought it might be possible to take
advantage of that and solve some issues of connectivity.
Well, on the subject of GPU speeds, there are other ways
Well, on the subject of GPU speeds, there are other ways that a good
graphics card could help :)
I'd love to see kinematics and/or TP calcs done on a GPU. Recent video
cards do single precision floating point very quickly, and the newest
set of GPUs can do double precision natively as
On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Andy Pugh wrote:
I'd love to see kinematics and/or TP calcs done on a GPU.
You undoubtedly know this, but the Folding At Home project has clients
that run on GPUs and also makes effective use of the Cell Processor in
the Playstation3
Check out the OpenCL spec,
On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:55 AM, John Thornton wrote:
If I am using a servo with 512 PPR, is a step 1/512 of a revolution?
If your servo drives take step and direction signals then they are
just like steppers to the
software. If it takes 512 steps to go one revolution and it takes
two
Jeshua Lacock wrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:55 AM, John Thornton wrote:
If I am using a servo with 512 PPR, is a step 1/512 of a revolution?
If your servo drives take step and direction signals then they are
just like steppers to the
software. If it takes 512 steps to go one
Thank you very much for your help mark.
2009/11/11 Mark mpic...@gmail.com
Oops, didn't pay attention to what you said. The power button still won't
work; you must shutdown from within the os - either by clicking the
shutdown
icon or menu item on the screen, or with 'shutdown -h now' on
Hello everybody, i'm finishing with the setup of my machine and i have one
question..
How can i link a signal to a bash script? is it possible to make a component
with the sript in it and then use the component to activate that script
whenever i want?
Thanks in adavance for your help.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos spad...@sover.netwrote:
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
Instead of the parallel port or the NIC should we (someone) consider
the
video connection as an alternative interface. I would guess not all the
pins
are used and with some
here is a real time usb project - I am not a programmer so I cannot evaluate
this
http://gna.org/projects/usb20rt
the source is attached
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Yi-Shin Li y...@araisrobo.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos spad...@sover.net
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com wrote:
here is a real time usb project - I am not a programmer so I cannot
evaluate
this
http://gna.org/projects/usb20rt
the source is attached
The attached usb20rt.tar.bz2 is not extractable. The functional one is
I'm interested in adopting the USB interface for
servo/stepper motor control.
It's cheap and widely available, although it has quiet
significant latency issue.
I'm working on resolving issues around USB interface.
Here's a video for a SCARA robot controlled by EMC2 and a USB
control
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
I am in no hurry whatsoever. I just threw up a trial balloon to see the
comments. With the GPU speeds I thought it might be possible to take
advantage of that and solve some issues of connectivity
If you are not using the graphics output for anything, then
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
Well, on the subject of GPU speeds, there are other ways that a good
graphics card could help :)
I'd love to see kinematics and/or TP calcs done on a GPU. Recent video
cards do single precision floating point very quickly, and the newest
set of GPUs can do
On Nov 12, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
I'd love to see kinematics and/or TP calcs done on a GPU. Recent
video
cards do single precision floating point very quickly, and the newest
set of GPUs can do double precision natively as well. Got a
kinematics
problem that requires 1000
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Yi-Shin Li wrote:
I'm interested in adopting the USB interface for servo/stepper motor
control.
It's cheap and widely available, although it has quiet significant
latency
issue.
I'm working on resolving issues
The 30 day trial is full function everything for 30 days. It reverts to
cad only after 30 days. When you purchase the product you enter a new
access code and it you then have that product and it doesn't cancel
out. Actually if you use it incessantly during the trail period it can
time
26 matches
Mail list logo
