Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
30 Henry Street > Dalton, Ohio 44618 > Phone: (330)828-2105ext. 2031 > > -Original Message- > From: John Dammeyer > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2021 3:41 PM > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)' > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 > >

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021, John Dammeyer wrote: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:40:34 -0800 From: John Dammeyer Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" To: "'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'" Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 From: Les Newell [mailto:les.n

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Todd Zuercher
: Thursday, March 04, 2021 3:41 PM To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)' Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe. > From: Les Newell [mailto:les.new...@fastmail.co.uk] > > I'm going to guess that low-level I/O error is

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
> From: Les Newell [mailto:les.new...@fastmail.co.uk] > > I'm going to guess that low-level I/O error is a general > > _Following_Error_Joint_2_? > > No. It is a different error. I can't remember the exact wording but I > have seen it before. > > The following error message is correct. With

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
troller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 > > sorry to throw something else into the mix... I was getting following > errors without realtime errors on the pie because the default internet time > sync (timesyncd) sucked.. > > timesyncd vs ntp > > http

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 04 March 2021 12:59:28 Sam Sokolik wrote: > sorry to throw something else into the mix... I was getting following > errors without realtime errors on the pie because the default internet > time sync (timesyncd) sucked.. > > timesyncd vs ntp > >

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Les Newell
I'm going to guess that low-level I/O error is a general _Following_Error_Joint_2_? No. It is a different error. I can't remember the exact wording but I have seen it before. The following error message is correct. With steppers you have two acceleration settings. There is the joint

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Sam Sokolik
sorry to throw something else into the mix... I was getting following errors without realtime errors on the pie because the default internet time sync (timesyncd) sucked.. timesyncd vs ntp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDKaFJmB254 On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:37 AM John Dammeyer wrote: > > A

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
> A following error is _expected_ if the stepgen maxaccel parameter is not at > least 2x the joints maxaccel value (or if any stepgen constraint is lower > than what linuxCNC may command it to do) So HAL setup can absolutely cause > following errors. > > > > But if electrical noise from the higher

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Thaddeus Waldner
> > Perhaps you can explain why that message shows up at all in an open loop > situation? What does the FPGA do that would cause that? Is there a separate > message for missing Ethernet or out of sequence Ethernet packets or is it > lumped into Following Error on Joint? A further question

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
> From: Peter C. Wallace [mailto:p...@mesanet.com] > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, John Dammeyer wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:11:23 -0800 > > From: John Dammeyer > >>> The comment on the link about Ethernet latency is what interested me. > >>> Again if electrical noise causes retries or delays in

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, John Dammeyer wrote: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 23:11:23 -0800 From: John Dammeyer Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" To: "'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'" Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 The comment on the link ab

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread Les Newell
LinuxCNC is designed to run servos. The stepgens simulate servos and will throw a following error if they are unable to generate steps at the commanded rate or acceleration. As Peter says, you probably increase your stepgen acceleration. Les On 04/03/2021 03:17, John Dammeyer wrote: The

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-04 Thread John Dammeyer
troller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 > > That was my thinking. It would also need to be a smart motor driver that > senses motor rotor position either via encoder or back emf > and adjusts motor current based on load. > > Thaddeus Waldner > ___

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread John Dammeyer
> > > > The comment on the link about Ethernet latency is what interested me. > > Again if electrical noise causes retries or delays in the Ethernet > > signalling then that could cause this sort of error under heavy load. > > > > John > > And this is what the high frequency gains do, FF2 and

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 03 March 2021 22:17:35 John Dammeyer wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net] > > Sent: March-03-21 6:40 PM > > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Thaddeus Waldner
Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 On 03/03/2021 09:17 PM, John Dammeyer wrote: > > Recall this is open loop motion with no feedback from the > servo other than if the servo faults which it doesn't. So > weight shouldn't matter. S

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread John Dammeyer
> -Original Message- > From: Jon Elson [mailto:el...@pico-systems.com] > On 03/03/2021 09:17 PM, John Dammeyer wrote: > > Recall this is open loop motion with no feedback from the > > servo other than if the servo faults which it doesn't. So > > weight shouldn't matter. Should it? >

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Jon Elson
On 03/03/2021 09:17 PM, John Dammeyer wrote: Recall this is open loop motion with no feedback from the servo other than if the servo faults which it doesn't. So weight shouldn't matter. Should it? OK,this is EXTREMELY bizarre! In open loop, how could LinuxCNC know anything about the load on

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread John Dammeyer
> -Original Message- > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net] > Sent: March-03-21 6:40 PM > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 > > On Wednesday 03 March 2021 20:18:44 Gene Heskett wrote: > > >

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 03 March 2021 20:18:44 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 03 March 2021 19:42:25 John Dammeyer wrote: > > I made another video with the new 3D printed pulley. Much better > > balanced as I made the inner hole and outside hub thicker and then > > bored and turned it to the correct

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 03 March 2021 19:42:25 John Dammeyer wrote: > I made another video with the new 3D printed pulley. Much better > balanced as I made the inner hole and outside hub thicker and then > bored and turned it to the correct diameter and concentric with each > other. Now just shows the Z

Re: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, John Dammeyer wrote: Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:42:25 -0800 From: John Dammeyer Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" Subject: [Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2 I made another video with the n

[Emc-users] Following Error Joint 2

2021-03-03 Thread John Dammeyer
I made another video with the new 3D printed pulley. Much better balanced as I made the inner hole and outside hub thicker and then bored and turned it to the correct diameter and concentric with each other. Now just shows the Z axis jogging up and down after homing. I still get the

Re: [Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-08 Thread Rob Jansen
Andy, could it be that my z-axis is too slow for a certain movement? i think the errors happen on g0 commands after about 40mm of movement. if there is a time constraint, the software could trap into a timeout and answer with a following error - but, to be hounest, this sounds ridiculous

Re: [Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-08 Thread Ray Henry
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 08:04 +0200, Rob Jansen wrote: Rob P.s: Don't get me wrong. The EPIA is a very good board, I have 2 EPIA boards running web servers with scripting, SQL server and subversion server for 7 years now and they never failed on me (except for that one time where

[Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-07 Thread Andi Frommel
hi folks i'm new to this... new to cnc new to emc2 new to linux since i've almost finished a conversion of a desktop micro mill, i tried some of the example g-code files installed from the bdi. i use brushed dc motors together with whale2 drivers in step/dir mode. so far so good - but sometimes

Re: [Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-07 Thread Jeff Epler
When emc shows the following error on joint message for a stepdirection system, that means the system is misconfigured. There are two main causes for this error: Cause 1: Insufficient headroom for acceleration and/or velocity. Emc2 defines velocity and acceleration limits in both the trajectory

Re: [Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-07 Thread Jeff Epler
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:12:06PM +, Andi Frommel wrote: well, i don't think it's that old if i'm not wrong, then it's this one: # MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org) # Generated 10.07.2008 13:26:39 d2334dbba7313e9abc8c7c072d2af09c

Re: [Emc-users] Following error joint 2

2008-08-07 Thread Jon Elson
Jeff Epler wrote: Ubuntu is different than BDI. BDI is an older customized linux distribution created before Ubuntu became popular. We now encourage all new users to use Ubuntu 8.04 unless its minimum requirements are too great; in that case, use 6.06 but be aware that it won't receive