On 5/10/2012 10:11 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Kent A. Reed wrote:
As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required, Jon
has been waiting for several years for RT-Linux to be ported
satisfactorily to the BeagleBoard.
Slight error, it is RTAI that is not yet available on the
On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse scott.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Ask Jon Elson for a different opinion as an interested party who is a
component vendor and system integrator.
As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required,
Jon has been waiting for
On 5/10/2012 6:25 AM, Bill Hill wrote:
On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hassescott.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those
On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reedkentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control take a
look at Mesa's SOFTDMC. Implements a configurable accel/decel, jerk
limited and very fast servo
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.comwrote:
I love distributed control but it seems to me the sub-USD100 Intel
Atom-based integrated motherboards have sucked the air out of the room.
They're good enough and cheap enough.
When the P4 came around and had the
On 5/10/2012 1:50 PM, Eric Keller wrote:
We are using
Beagleboards for our autonomous robots, that is a really good place for
them.
Exactly my interest. Microcontroller-based solutions pale in comparison.
Regards,
Kent
Scott Hasse wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
given any thought to this potentially disruptive
Kent A. Reed wrote:
As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required, Jon
has been waiting for several years for RT-Linux to be ported
satisfactorily to the BeagleBoard.
Slight error, it is RTAI that is not yet available on the Beagle. I
believe RT-Preempt
may be
Eric Keller wrote:
At least the ARM boards have the potential for replacing the PC, but a
Beagleboard is more expensive than a much more capable Atom.
This may not be quite true. The Beagle has integrated memory, and can
use very cheap
(4G, 8G) SD cards for hard drive. The Atom needs to have
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:42 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reedkentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control
take a look at
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
given any thought to this potentially disruptive platform in the context
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse scott.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/9/2012 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I
correct in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those
would require an arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the
device-specific
On 5/9/2012 9:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
given any thought to this
15 matches
Mail list logo
