On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:46:34 +0100, you wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:39, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
how about a blue tooth transmitter? our mazak probes were set up that way
I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a BT transmitter/receiver that you
can run a servo off of :-)
Why not?
On 7/18/2014 11:41 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:52, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
cnc converted boring head? so do you have a picasa link
Nothing very clear.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/S-B_UUeTCf7O9skh1MiT7NMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
I should do
What about mercury slip rings?
- Original Message -
From: jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:39:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Slip ring - experiences
how about a blue tooth transmitter
On 19 July 2014 08:15, Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net wrote:
I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a BT transmitter/receiver that you
can run a servo off of :-)
Why not? Plenty of wireless controls in industry.
He is trying to run a servo through the slip rings.
I was trying to be funny.
On Saturday 19 July 2014 08:28:09 andy pugh did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 19 July 2014 08:15, Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net wrote:
I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a BT transmitter/receiver that
you can run a servo off of :-)
Why not? Plenty of wireless controls in industry.
Hi Gene
Power thru the rings seems easy enough to do, but shipping the encoder
back thru adjacent slip rings would seem to be to subject to a huge
amount
of interference from the servo motors cummutation noises.
One way to rid of this is to use optical transmission, so rings of
acrylic
Hi Tomaz
Does anyone here have any experiences with slip ring components?
Well, I don't have any personal experience, but I recently spent some
time reading about the subject as I wanted to use slip-rings in a
project (unfortunately it was canceled) to transmit 100 Mbit Ethernet
and power).
Hi all!
On 19.07.2014 16:36, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2014 08:28:09 andy pugh did opine
...
Power thru the rings seems easy enough to do, but shipping the encoder
back thru adjacent slip rings would seem to be to subject to a huge amount
of interference from the servo
Hi,
Does anyone here have any experiences with slip ring components? I'm thinking
to use it to make one of my rotating axes limitless, but I would need to lead
trough this device encoder and limit switch signals and also power lines for
one servo and spindle...I'm a bit worried about encoder
Limitless rotary axes are not really limitless.
My bridge 5 axis with Fanuc 15mb will rotate 9,999.999 degrees before the
register overflows. I realize LinuxCNC will not have this small limit.
For most things 9,999.999 degrees equates to limitless.
LinuxCNC would be 'limitless' in more situations.
how about a blue tooth transmitter? our mazak probes were set up that way
jeremy youngs
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Tomaz T. tomaz_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone here have any experiences with slip ring components? I'm
thinking to use it to make one of my rotating axes
didnt consider that andy , until after the send button .
cnc converted boring head? so do you have a picasa link so i can peek in
awe of your talents yet agaij ?:)
jeremy youngs
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:39, jeremy youngs
Rotary transformers may be a better idea than slip rings. AC couple
everything. Resolvers, being AC in nature, work very well through them.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:46 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:39, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
how about a
On 18 July 2014 17:39, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
how about a blue tooth transmitter? our mazak probes were set up that way
I wouldn't want to be anywhere near a BT transmitter/receiver that you
can run a servo off of :-)
However, this does make me wonder what the geometry is and
Encode on RF and use a rotary transformer like used in old video
recorders, could be less likely to lose signal/dropouts etc if encased
properly
Dave Caroline
On 18/07/2014, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:39, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
how about a blue
For the encoder why not wireless, RF, wifi or other, powered with a battery. I
have not looked for the correct protocolbut it is just an encoder that needs to
get data to the computer. Motor cables would be different.
Dale
On Friday, July 18, 2014 12:55 PM, Stephen Dubovsky
On 18 July 2014 17:52, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
cnc converted boring head? so do you have a picasa link
Nothing very clear.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/S-B_UUeTCf7O9skh1MiT7NMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
I should do a proper write-up. I was thinking that there
that kicks butt andy , patents be damned build a dozen and sell them
jeremy youngs
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2014 17:52, jeremy youngs jcyoung...@gmail.com wrote:
cnc converted boring head? so do you have a picasa link
Nothing
18 matches
Mail list logo
