Re: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards

2012-07-25 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 7/24/2012 9:18 PM, cogoman wrote: On 07/24/2012 07:08 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote: Any thoughts? From what I've seen looking into USB 2.0 device programming, the transfers are too quick for most (maybe all) microcontrollers to keep up with in software, so you are generally tied to DMA

[Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards

2012-07-24 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 7/24/2012 5:55 AM, andy pugh wrote: On 24 July 2012 03:09, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote: I've got a D525mw, and every once in a while it'll throw up an RTAI error. I found that my D510 was very reliable for latency unless I had the webcam plugged in. There doesn't seem to be any

Re: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards

2012-07-24 Thread Ralph Stirling
Controller (EMC) Subject: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards On 7/24/2012 5:55 AM, andy pugh wrote: On 24 July 2012 03:09, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote: I've got a D525mw, and every once in a while it'll throw up an RTAI error. I found that my D510

Re: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards

2012-07-24 Thread Kent A. Reed
: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:08 AM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards On 7/24/2012 5:55 AM, andy pugh wrote: On 24 July 2012 03:09, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote: I've got a D525mw, and every once

Re: [Emc-users] USB badness, was Re: BASE_PERIOD and Intel D525MW boards

2012-07-24 Thread cogoman
On 07/24/2012 07:08 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote: Any thoughts? From what I've seen looking into USB 2.0 device programming, the transfers are too quick for most (maybe all) microcontrollers to keep up with in software, so you are generally tied to DMA transfers on the microcontroller side. FTDI